1547
I Believe Sydney Powell (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by NeverLeft ago by NeverLeft +1548 / -1
Comments (56)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-25
radome -25 points ago +7 / -32

sErVeR rAiD sIdNeY

LOL. Dumb Q-Tard, grifting cunt.

29
Judiwont 29 points ago +31 / -2

Really? I mean she did get a case in front of the Supreme Court. She’s out there trying and fighting about the stolen election and you call her a Q-Tard grouting cunt. How many cases do you have going about election fraud?

11
Carbum 11 points ago +11 / -0

She got 5 cases in front of the court and Wood has one... seems to be they were telling the truth and Trump didn't have the balls to act.

-13
MAGA1775 -13 points ago +9 / -22

Powell and Lin Wood did more damage to the case than good. They took all the attention away from the legitimate, plain-sight mail-in ballot fraud to promote hysterical theories such as black ops secret CIA server raids, DoD Kraken programs that have them all caught, control rooms overseas flipping votes that are controlled by the ghost of Hugo Chavez, etc.

Made the legal case look like a complete circus and successfully distracted everyone from the mail-in ballots and signatures (which is how they stole it).

22
Platinum 22 points ago +25 / -3

The Mail In Ballots weren't the main source of the cheating. It was the Computer/Counting Algorithms. She was right to shift attention to that. The Mail in ballots were easy to point out. But in the end nothing mattered because the Courts were Partisan. Which is fucked.

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

Without mail-in ballots, Trump would have won. There's a reason they had to shut the election down and spend a week finding enough ballots to beat Trump's huge lead.

If they had machines to do it, they wouldn't need to do that. They could also make it match the polls. Also Hillary would have won in 2016 since all they would have to do is hit a button.

Its MUCH EASIER to get away with rigging with mail-in ballots. It outsources the fraud.

We can point out the mail-in ballots, but there's a reason they refused to do any signature audits. Also all of the attention was taken away from that.

-4
Hardcouer -4 points ago +4 / -8

Na man, it was old fashioned fraud. Why would the Detroit monitors block up the windows if they had an algorithm to do the steal? Why were there boxes of ballots in Georgia? Why were the monitors sent home? The only solid evidence for the Dominion theory is the reluctance of AZ to let people audit the machine. Which stinks to high heaven.

14
NeverLeft [S] 14 points ago +15 / -1

Be interesting to come back to this in a few months. As far as I can see Lin Wood and Sydney Powell are the ONLY ones to get the election fraud in front of the supreme courts

7
The_Litehaus_Abides 7 points ago +8 / -1

Jenna Ellis is a grifting disgrace. I saw on Gab that she's now shilling a podcast she's going to be doing. Can't stand her.

She didn't do one damn thing for President Trump except get in his way.

8
NimbleNavigator20202 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ok, but wasn't the singular machine audit we got in the small county proof of potentially more widespread machine Flipping? Perhaps not sending them away to another country and back though? Wasn't that Anterim County?

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
1
Observer95 1 point ago +1 / -0

There were others suing based on all kinds of fraud that had nothing to do with the machines and yet the courts ignored them. In Michigan, a supreme court judge clearly knew fraud happened and yet said if they looked into it, it would further delay the certification of the election.

The courts did not care. In a law abiding society, the judges would be investigated.

3
Carbum 3 points ago +4 / -1

Mike Lindell proved that shit. Sorry faggot.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0