Being in an abusive relationship where one person cheats on you and your self worth is so low, you just keep taking the abuse, hardly seems like something to celebrate.
This is what women want, though. The ability to be disloyal and have no principles, but not face any negative consequences because it will make them feel bad.
Maybe women were treated a certain way for thousands of years not because men were evil, but because they were smarter than we were.
This is what principle-less women want. No accountability. I wouldn't say all women. I know plenty who are in a nuclear patriarchal family, husband makes the money, everyone is fine. But I definitely know the kind you are speaking about, too.
I would take it a step further and say that virtually no woman wants this. The ones who practice it end up miserable. The ones who stay loyal to their husbands tend to end up feeling relatively happy as long as their husbands are also loyal.
It’s the shortsighted women who think being a loose whore = strong and independent who don’t need no man. Those are the ones to avoid. It’s not even close to a majority though.
You're conflating 2 definitions of want here. It has negative consequences for them, yes, but they DO want it anyway. They pushing for it hard. They all stick together. I also disagree that it's not a majority. Maybe that wasn't true before, but it is now.
This is also part of the reason why it's so easy for them to think men are discriminating against them. Because THEY all stick together. People have a tendency to project their own way of thinking on to other people, and when women do that, they come to the conclusion that men must be working together against them... because that's what women would do in their position.
This is backed up by science too. Many studies have proven women have an in-group bias, and men do not. Instead they have an out-group bias toward women.
There's an evolutionary imperative for this behavior in women: They want a stable long-term relationship with a man who will provide a decent "nest" and goods for her and her children, but she wants to screw a bad-boy because the bad-boy genes will carry her genes farther in the pool.
So marry a cuck, find a rogue to fuck. That makes sense in terms of genetics.
Men and women are biologically driven to quick short term relationships that will not last. The male equivalent is going after gold diggers, younger women, and crazy women.
its not what (most) of us women want. Maybe some younger ones. I would never consider being disloyal to my SO, I dont want multiple guys, I just want one good one.
That raises a good point: the position, the feelings of the daughter. Her mother and other "parent" allowed her to live in a lie for her whole life. That is really disgusting, IHMO. If I was her, I would be pissed off. And she had to know -- as well as ANYONE who saw it -- friends, relatives, teachers, neighbors...
I think this might go the other way. This dude won. The LONG game. He raised a great daughter. Kept a family together and happy and never said a word. Can you imagine how miserable the mother was. Day after day. Month after month. Year after year. Wondering when she was going to lose everything. She was married to a great husband, provider, and father. And she betrayed him. Obviously betrayed him. And at any given moment it all could shatter and she could lose everything. Can you imagine how hard she worked to be worthy for this man????
Being in an abusive relationship where one person cheats on you and your self worth is so low, you just keep taking the abuse, hardly seems like something to celebrate.
This is what women want, though. The ability to be disloyal and have no principles, but not face any negative consequences because it will make them feel bad. Maybe women were treated a certain way for thousands of years not because men were evil, but because they were smarter than we were.
This is what principle-less women want. No accountability. I wouldn't say all women. I know plenty who are in a nuclear patriarchal family, husband makes the money, everyone is fine. But I definitely know the kind you are speaking about, too.
I would take it a step further and say that virtually no woman wants this. The ones who practice it end up miserable. The ones who stay loyal to their husbands tend to end up feeling relatively happy as long as their husbands are also loyal.
It’s the shortsighted women who think being a loose whore = strong and independent who don’t need no man. Those are the ones to avoid. It’s not even close to a majority though.
You're conflating 2 definitions of want here. It has negative consequences for them, yes, but they DO want it anyway. They pushing for it hard. They all stick together. I also disagree that it's not a majority. Maybe that wasn't true before, but it is now.
This is also part of the reason why it's so easy for them to think men are discriminating against them. Because THEY all stick together. People have a tendency to project their own way of thinking on to other people, and when women do that, they come to the conclusion that men must be working together against them... because that's what women would do in their position.
This is backed up by science too. Many studies have proven women have an in-group bias, and men do not. Instead they have an out-group bias toward women.
They’re the most vocal
Proving BELIEVE ALL WOMEN.. if you're a FOOL.
There's an evolutionary imperative for this behavior in women: They want a stable long-term relationship with a man who will provide a decent "nest" and goods for her and her children, but she wants to screw a bad-boy because the bad-boy genes will carry her genes farther in the pool.
So marry a cuck, find a rogue to fuck. That makes sense in terms of genetics.
Strong physical qualities, boldness, confidence, aggression etc. mixed with her own in the form of a child.
It makes complete sense. This is evo-bio 101.
winners win.
Confidence is key.
A=Adulterous Bitch female B=Bad-Boy male C=Cuck male
A marries C, children are A+C genetics. Those cuck sons won't spread the A genes very far, because they're cucks.
A fucks B, children are A+B genetics: those bad-boy sons will fuck anything on two legs and carry those A genes far and wide.
Best strategy to spread A genes as far as possible is to get C to provide a home and bang the pool boy B like a bitch in heat.
Quod erat demonstrandum :)
Alpha fux and beta bux.
To add to what you're saying... Men are providers, they provide resources and/or genetic material.
The higher quality and quantity of both you can provide basically determines your mating potential.
If you're a 10 out of 10 for resources but a 1 out of 10 for genetics, you're probably going to end up a cuck.
People make fun of Bill Gates but he was smart to marry that ugly bitch.
😂 are we sure about that.
Yep, no consequences so we'll keep seeing this shit
I too have read the Red Queen, fellow pede.
Men and women are biologically driven to quick short term relationships that will not last. The male equivalent is going after gold diggers, younger women, and crazy women.
Liberalism wants no consequences for their actions, to have their cake and to eat it too.
its not what (most) of us women want. Maybe some younger ones. I would never consider being disloyal to my SO, I dont want multiple guys, I just want one good one.
Subtitle: "My Mom Was A Slut Whore".
That raises a good point: the position, the feelings of the daughter. Her mother and other "parent" allowed her to live in a lie for her whole life. That is really disgusting, IHMO. If I was her, I would be pissed off. And she had to know -- as well as ANYONE who saw it -- friends, relatives, teachers, neighbors...
I think this might go the other way. This dude won. The LONG game. He raised a great daughter. Kept a family together and happy and never said a word. Can you imagine how miserable the mother was. Day after day. Month after month. Year after year. Wondering when she was going to lose everything. She was married to a great husband, provider, and father. And she betrayed him. Obviously betrayed him. And at any given moment it all could shatter and she could lose everything. Can you imagine how hard she worked to be worthy for this man????
I think this dude won. Through actions.
Idk. You are obviously an optimist and I think that's pretty terrific.