Um...that's how vaccines work. They give you a crippled or dead version of a deadly virus, your body reacts to it, and can now fight it off more effectively if/when it encounters the real virus, later.
I thought she was fired for deliberately publishing data that was completely discredited and then charged for stealing property from her employer?
Since this is a screenshot, with 0 context, I'm going to assume that was still the case and that this is a retarded attempt to spread more false information and misinform the users on this board.
Or I've already done that months ago, and now I'm here warning everyone else who would think about sharing this stupid post designed to make us look stupid and give the opponent easy ways to attack and discredit us.
This lady knowingly used bad data in her analysis to come to a pre conceived result. This is just as bad as progressives skewing and misrepresenting climate data.
Then she was fired after continuing to pursue her hypothesis despite her colleagues proving to herself and a review panel that her studies were not done honestly.
She then went back to her lab and took research without going through the proper channels and was briefly jailed while resolving differences with the lab in court.
Then she went on to write a book with the worlds number #1 vaccine denier claiming that vaccines spread viruses and cause cancer.
Good links, although the last two I couldn't read due to needing subscriptions. But I did some more interview watching with her. Watched her portion of the documentary Plandemic. And some other clips. Have to say, you do not convince. Just because some charges were brought against her and claims were made hardly proves her to be any kind of 'fraud'. She seems to speak openly and honestly in all the interviews I've seen. Yes, there are sociopaths in the medical field, but I think it's more likely Gates and Fauci are based on their many reversed and obfuscated statements. No, fren, I appreciate your concern, but on this one I think it is you who might be buying the propaganda.
You don't need a subscription... I don't and I can read the full articles no problem.
She literally admits that she knew the samples were contaminated in an interview, and pushed the study forwards because she didn't want to throw the lab that contaminated the samples under the bus, and then stole all the data when she was fired over it. Nobody has been able to recreate her results and the lab still does not have any of the missing data. She co wrote a book with one of the worlds leading anti vaxxers.
Those are facts.
The image shared by OP is 100% wrong and misleading.
So you're saying the anti-vaxxers are right and all of those politicians getting saline shots are just virtue signaling? No way!
Yes, she is really good, she has an extensive video online, I think I saw it on bitchute
She’s legit. If I remember right she was a key figure in the first Plandemic documentary early last year.
She spilled the beans on Fauci and AIDS.
She's great. Fighting hard. My fear is they take her out.
Um...that's how vaccines work. They give you a crippled or dead version of a deadly virus, your body reacts to it, and can now fight it off more effectively if/when it encounters the real virus, later.
This isn't news.
I thought she was fired for deliberately publishing data that was completely discredited and then charged for stealing property from her employer?
Since this is a screenshot, with 0 context, I'm going to assume that was still the case and that this is a retarded attempt to spread more false information and misinform the users on this board.
Or you could check out what she has to say and make an informed decision: https://tv.gab.com/channel/ladybee/view/exclusive-interview-w-virologist-dr-judy-6025944a6dd6b28e4bd3b4d0
Or I've already done that months ago, and now I'm here warning everyone else who would think about sharing this stupid post designed to make us look stupid and give the opponent easy ways to attack and discredit us.
for those getting salty about this, this person is correct.
I happen to give her more credence because I've watched a lot of her stuff, but why shame someone for sticking to scientific method
edit: the part where he stands on rumor is not what I'm talking about, I'm talking about the healthy skepticism.
This lady knowingly used bad data in her analysis to come to a pre conceived result. This is just as bad as progressives skewing and misrepresenting climate data.
Then she was fired after continuing to pursue her hypothesis despite her colleagues proving to herself and a review panel that her studies were not done honestly.
She then went back to her lab and took research without going through the proper channels and was briefly jailed while resolving differences with the lab in court.
Then she went on to write a book with the worlds number #1 vaccine denier claiming that vaccines spread viruses and cause cancer.
Sauce. Show the debunk. I'm open to whatever you got, honestly.
Regarding her knowingly publishing a study that used contaminated samples and then commenting on the eventual retraction:
https://retractionwatch.com/2011/10/03/why-didnt-xmrv-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-researcher-mikovits-now-fired-share-data-with-science/
She was charged with two felonies:
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/754423
Charges were dropped not because there was no case, but because the judge didn't want to step on a federal case involving WPIs founder.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-met-mikovits-charges-main-20120615-story.html
Good links, although the last two I couldn't read due to needing subscriptions. But I did some more interview watching with her. Watched her portion of the documentary Plandemic. And some other clips. Have to say, you do not convince. Just because some charges were brought against her and claims were made hardly proves her to be any kind of 'fraud'. She seems to speak openly and honestly in all the interviews I've seen. Yes, there are sociopaths in the medical field, but I think it's more likely Gates and Fauci are based on their many reversed and obfuscated statements. No, fren, I appreciate your concern, but on this one I think it is you who might be buying the propaganda.
You don't need a subscription... I don't and I can read the full articles no problem.
She literally admits that she knew the samples were contaminated in an interview, and pushed the study forwards because she didn't want to throw the lab that contaminated the samples under the bus, and then stole all the data when she was fired over it. Nobody has been able to recreate her results and the lab still does not have any of the missing data. She co wrote a book with one of the worlds leading anti vaxxers.
Those are facts.
The image shared by OP is 100% wrong and misleading.