3264
()             MAGA            
posted ago by HanLoco ago by HanLoco +3268 / -4
Comments (263)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
YourOwnGreatGrandma -1 points ago +1 / -2

You’re just making excuses for the fact you didn’t donate or do shit. Elections aren’t entirely decided by money, you dense pos. We could have won this election even if we coulda got Biden’s fundraising advantage down to 2:1... our fundraising was pitiful, it didn’t amount to 1% of our combined net worth.

You’re like a helpless unemployed leftist who constantly makes excuses as to why you didn’t even put in a single job application... they won’t hire me! I won’t like it! It’s not that much money! etc etc

Sadly worthless people like you who do nothing except throw blame around are a dime a dozen around here, and you’re exactly why we lost.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a view of how things would have gone and as of yet you haven't done anything to dissuade it. I'm trying to get information that would prove me wrong. I want to be able to say "Well, now that I think about it that way, you're right, maybe we could have solved this with more donations", and you're being as weaselly as fucking possible trying to avoid giving me a single example of anything that would actually have changed. If it's so clear cut and dry this should take you 30 fucking seconds to rattle off all sorts of concrete differences and instead you're just attacking me.

I have given you every opportunity to present some sort of logical argument and you have done nothing to convince me. It's just "lol more money would've solved it, why didn't you throw more money at it, quit making excuses". I've given you a number of reasons why - mostly because the other side has more money. If they don't want to be outspent, they won't be. Is that wrong? If so, why?

I don't like to dismiss arguments like this with claims of "shill" but damn if you aren't acting like one right now.

-1
YourOwnGreatGrandma -1 points ago +1 / -2

I already told you the concrete difference. More money is more ads. More ads is more votes. More votes means we can overcome the moderate amount of fraud the Dems likely committed.

This is American politics 101. Do you really need someone to explain to you that money wins elections? You’re just beating around the Bush because you can’t face the fact that the “patriots” who claim they’d “die” for the country wouldn’t even sacrifice a small amount of money for it. They chose Netflix and Amazon subscriptions over their country and want to blame Dems for fraud they’ve been doing forever.

And don’t give me this shit about big corporations. Our grad roots fundraising was lower than Biden’s too. Republicans have an entitled fucking attitude and expect everyone else to save the country for them. They don’t donate or so shit themselves bc they’re selfish pricks and they don’t actually believe the shit they say about The Biden Admin being a communist tyranny.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

overcome the moderate amount of fraud the Dems likely committed.

Ah, the Cruz line. So, you admit previously that they have committed fraud. You don't think it's to the degree that it's represented here, but admit that it happened. We're both aware that not a single person has been held accountable for it. My question then is, if they're not going to be held accountable for fraud, if audits aren't going to be allowed, why would they not have just.. added a couple extra Biden-only mail-in ballots to their 4AM dumps to offset those votes we would hypothetically have earned with a few more ads?

Sorry, not buying it. "Well, they're allowed to commit fraud, but I'm sure if we got a couple thousand more valid votes they would've stopped at just a moderate 10,000 illegal votes instead of 25,000." Why? Nothing's stopping them.

-1
YourOwnGreatGrandma -1 points ago +1 / -2

Obviously republcians cucked out by not having a serious investigation. That still doesn’t mean there’s reason to believe the election was irreversibly rigged.

There were audits of random samples of votes. Statistically we would have found fraud in those votes if there was the kind of fraud you’re talking about.

There’s no basis to believe there were millions of rigged votes. This is a baseless conspiracy theory. You can say it MIGHT happened but that is meaningless speculation. Trump MIGHT be a russian.