Why is this stickied, and yet some interesting data put together by the Media Research Center and reported on by the federalist (https://patriots.win/p/12hReJAFBp/big-info-was-enough-for-the-stea/c/) was not?
Perhaps that post was stickied earlier, judging by the number of comments I’d guess not, but I’m not here 24/7.
Right now we’ve got some words circled on a Time Magazine article stickied, and real research done by people devoted to overseeing the media down below it.
I regularly the question the judgment of some of the mods. Is there a way we can see who stickies what? I wanna know who is keeping us on track and who is just derailing our efforts.
Edit: mods... this has gotta be a troll. Guy just starting posting today. Good job MAGAthor, your shitpost got stickied.
As a critique, I’m fine seeing an archive link to a very relevant Time story. It’s a puff piece for a bunch of behind-the-scenes lefties, but it’s hard to see how it’s, “fake”. Basically the subjects of the article feel pretty clever and were flattered Time wrote about them, so years from now, when I’m waiting for my kids at the dentists office, I can read the story of how the AFL and some big corporations “saved” the election.
Why is this stickied, and yet some interesting data put together by the Media Research Center and reported on by the federalist (https://patriots.win/p/12hReJAFBp/big-info-was-enough-for-the-stea/c/) was not? Perhaps that post was stickied earlier, judging by the number of comments I’d guess not, but I’m not here 24/7. Right now we’ve got some words circled on a Time Magazine article stickied, and real research done by people devoted to overseeing the media down below it. I regularly the question the judgment of some of the mods. Is there a way we can see who stickies what? I wanna know who is keeping us on track and who is just derailing our efforts.
Edit: mods... this has gotta be a troll. Guy just starting posting today. Good job MAGAthor, your shitpost got stickied.
No article/image from Time should be featured. It's all fake even if it does lend its hand to the "right" point of view - its just manipulation.
As a critique, I’m fine seeing an archive link to a very relevant Time story. It’s a puff piece for a bunch of behind-the-scenes lefties, but it’s hard to see how it’s, “fake”. Basically the subjects of the article feel pretty clever and were flattered Time wrote about them, so years from now, when I’m waiting for my kids at the dentists office, I can read the story of how the AFL and some big corporations “saved” the election.