We need at least 2 more masks on each of those stacks.
Even my Uber leftie mother in law, phd in chemical engineer. When I asked her, when trying to filter particulates, if using a filter and adding another filter of the same partial size, as an example of double masking, would the filtration effect increase? Even she laughed and said that was ridiculous. Yet, continues to believe "experts" on all things Covid.
Ackchyually each smokestack would require 2 masks. Check and mate.
We already do that. We put scrubbers in all our smoke stacks and cut emissions by 80%.
I didnt know that. Thanks
We need at least 2 more masks on each of those stacks.
Even my Uber leftie mother in law, phd in chemical engineer. When I asked her, when trying to filter particulates, if using a filter and adding another filter of the same partial size, as an example of double masking, would the filtration effect increase? Even she laughed and said that was ridiculous. Yet, continues to believe "experts" on all things Covid.
Hahahahaha!!!! Take my updoot you glorious sonofabich
LOL
Nice...
If it'll stop a Virus .... !!
Go Home Hunter, you're high. Just because your father says you're smart...
I demand a lefty who thinks a piece of cloth can stop the Coof explain to me why this won't work.
It can be solved the same way as covid. Stop talking about it
We already use filters there.
No it needs wind blades to disperse the smoke
Brilliant move!
lmao, how is this not stickied.
Ah finally some real science!
Top Kek
Politifact: FALSE
at least 3 masks would be needed