I'll say you're half right. If you hit somebody with a stray bullet, you should be responsible for that. However, if you simply break up a robbery, potentially save a life, and nobody is harmed, what exactly are you responsible for?
There is also a constitutional argument that you can. There is nothing against warning shots in our constitution. Good luck ever getting our courts to admit that.
In my state you are responsible for where every bullet goes so if you miss and strike a person you can and will get in trouble. Pulling your gun is the warning shot, every shot after that is to end the threat.
I do agree with you but the law isn't going to be followed anymore so we can't look at things from that perspective. Anyone who defends their self or defends another is going to be at least persecuted and at most prosecuted and throw in jail.
Obviously we here all know the Deep State doesn't want anyone to stand up and rebel against unjust authority so examples have to be made but that will backfire on them as it always does.
Do the police have to follow that same rule? In my state I know they shot over 120 rounds at a kid armed with a cellphone, assumed it was a deadly weapon, and kept firing until they killed him. They also hit a random Mexican in the arm who in a bar with one of the strays, he refused to press charges for probably obvious reasons...
Oh right "rules for thee but not for me!!!" type BS I'm sure...
Local is where the battle has to be fought and won. Cities and even some States can be delivered from the Deep State and we can have some safer havens to work out of. Gonna be real difficult as it's going to get very very bad in a short time from now.
When the grocery stores empty out and aren't filled again chaos will ensue.
I'll say you're half right. If you hit somebody with a stray bullet, you should be responsible for that. However, if you simply break up a robbery, potentially save a life, and nobody is harmed, what exactly are you responsible for?
There is also a constitutional argument that you can. There is nothing against warning shots in our constitution. Good luck ever getting our courts to admit that.
In my state you are responsible for where every bullet goes so if you miss and strike a person you can and will get in trouble. Pulling your gun is the warning shot, every shot after that is to end the threat.
I do agree with you but the law isn't going to be followed anymore so we can't look at things from that perspective. Anyone who defends their self or defends another is going to be at least persecuted and at most prosecuted and throw in jail.
Obviously we here all know the Deep State doesn't want anyone to stand up and rebel against unjust authority so examples have to be made but that will backfire on them as it always does.
Do the police have to follow that same rule? In my state I know they shot over 120 rounds at a kid armed with a cellphone, assumed it was a deadly weapon, and kept firing until they killed him. They also hit a random Mexican in the arm who in a bar with one of the strays, he refused to press charges for probably obvious reasons... Oh right "rules for thee but not for me!!!" type BS I'm sure...
Laws are for us plebs only
Get onto juries and nullify those prosecutors.
If we don't fulfill our duty as one of the constitutional checks and balances against corrupt prosecution then we can't complain about the system.
Local is where the battle has to be fought and won. Cities and even some States can be delivered from the Deep State and we can have some safer havens to work out of. Gonna be real difficult as it's going to get very very bad in a short time from now.
When the grocery stores empty out and aren't filled again chaos will ensue.