First, we go from the headline that says "would" to a first paragraph that says "could."
Second, A Convention of States has been accepted by a LOT of conservatives ever since the concept was pushed forth by Mark Levine...who is no fan of Soros.
It's true that talks could go in unintended directions, and depending on the states involved, could end up being worse in the end.
But this appears to be more of a Parler hit peice than anything else.
I know nothing about Parler's CEO, but he is on the right side on this issue.
An "Article V Convention of States" is simply a mechanism to propose amendments to the constitution, which then have to go through the same ratification process as any other proposed amendment: 3/4 of the states would have to agree. It is the only way to get an amendment without the approval of Congress; for example, do you think Congress is going to approve an amendment for term limits? Or anything else that limits their power?
Oh, so now we hate Parler for calling for the same Constitutional Convention that about half of us support?
Can we stop this stupid Parler hate from all the Gab fanboys? There’s nothing in the law that says we’re only allowed to have one social media site, so why are you all trying to force us to choose?
Okay. This story is partly bullshit.
First, we go from the headline that says "would" to a first paragraph that says "could."
Second, A Convention of States has been accepted by a LOT of conservatives ever since the concept was pushed forth by Mark Levine...who is no fan of Soros.
It's true that talks could go in unintended directions, and depending on the states involved, could end up being worse in the end.
But this appears to be more of a Parler hit peice than anything else.
Like all Corps, they buckle to pressure and replace the leadership or they will get shutdown/go underground.
I know nothing about Parler's CEO, but he is on the right side on this issue.
An "Article V Convention of States" is simply a mechanism to propose amendments to the constitution, which then have to go through the same ratification process as any other proposed amendment: 3/4 of the states would have to agree. It is the only way to get an amendment without the approval of Congress; for example, do you think Congress is going to approve an amendment for term limits? Or anything else that limits their power?
Oh, so now we hate Parler for calling for the same Constitutional Convention that about half of us support?
Can we stop this stupid Parler hate from all the Gab fanboys? There’s nothing in the law that says we’re only allowed to have one social media site, so why are you all trying to force us to choose?
Because it's a false flag, they want your information.
"The main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat."
"The Capitalist Threat" by George Soros, www.theatlantic.com. February 1997