1061
Comments (287)
sorted by:
53
RedditStillSucks 53 points ago +75 / -22

Leftist shill. The only difference between fascism and communism is the propaganda

34
NullifyAndSecede 34 points ago +40 / -6

OP's logic is flawed. But in keeping with his flawed logic...

The people destroying and subverting our country hate individualism above all else.

Collectivism is a cancer, regardless of the flavor.

23
whataboob 23 points ago +24 / -1

They are quite literally fascist.

It’s been proven beyond a doubt when the Massachusetts Secretary of State was caught ordering Twitter to ban Dr, Shiva Ayyadurai from twitter because he was exposing their election fraud.

It’s now part of court record, where MA lost the case against Shiva, and the SOS was punished (far too lightly) for being an actual, outright, documented fascist.

They are fascists.

10
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 10 points ago +10 / -0

Mussolini (founder of fascism) said that it should really be called corporatism, because it is the merger of state and corporate power.

4
TheWestYearZero 4 points ago +7 / -3

Families are collectivist.

Clans are collectivist.

Familes and clans protect us from exploiters and give us alternatives and safe places and security.

They don't want you to have families.

3
madamaw 3 points ago +7 / -4

Families aren't collectivist. Families are a biological reality. Collectivism is a putrid ideology of lies.

4
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 4 points ago +8 / -4

Families are absolutely collectivist. Biological relation is the biological reality, but the social cohesion is a collective action that can be, and is being, subverted at every turn. How many dumb zoomer cunts have stopped talking to their parents over Drumpf?

2
AUS4MAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem here is you don't understand what collectivism is/means.

1
madamaw 1 point ago +4 / -3

Families are absolutely collectivist

No they're not.

0
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 0 points ago +4 / -4

They are, and to say otherwise is, itself, subversive.
This is why we lose. Even people who think they're right-wing live in a leftist worldview.

2
madamaw 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, I just don't think the abstract concept of a family is more important than the quality of its actual individual members.

1
jomten 1 point ago +1 / -0

Collectivist in a way yes, I don't want to completely disregard your view, but collectivist isnt the right word IMO.

Tribalist might be a better word, because collectivism implies EVERYONE being a part of the group, usually by exterminating anyone not willing to join.

Tribalism is actually closer to what the founders intended, keeping groups small and no entangling alliances, "Tribes" can collaborate and work together but should not be able to exert force on each other except in the most universally accepted situations. Thou shalt not kill, steal, rape etc

1
hunterhiden 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does that have to do with government?

2
TheWestYearZero 2 points ago +5 / -3

My family is not a cancer.

2
madamaw 2 points ago +4 / -2

Family isn't an example of collectivism. Collectivism is an ideology where the collective is more important than the individual. Is the abstract idea of a family more important to you than your family members themselves?

7
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 7 points ago +12 / -5

There have been a lot of these shills here over the last few days.

1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 1 point ago +14 / -13

"Everyone who says something I don't like is a shill!"

7
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 7 points ago +13 / -6

Nah, only leftist fucktards. You can peddle your collectivist, big government bullshit somewhere else.

-7
deleted -7 points ago +5 / -12
7
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 7 points ago +12 / -5

Eat a bag of dicks you leftist shit stain.

1
Monkeybeardontcare 1 point ago +5 / -4

Yea the fuktards can’t argue so they infiltrate. Fuk this leftist. They doing to this site what they tried doing to the protest jan 6th, paint it as something it’s not

1
ZoomerCrusader 1 point ago +2 / -1

He has 9309 post score, 3043 comment score and joined 335 days ago. He's not a shill.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
-6
deleted -6 points ago +3 / -9
4
deleted 4 points ago +10 / -6
9
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 9 points ago +12 / -3

"All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state."

-Benito Mussolini

Fascists value individuals only as cogs are valued in a machine. Communism, fascism, islam, and all other totalitarian ideologies are inherently anti-individual and anti-freedom.

0
deleted 0 points ago +12 / -12
6
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 6 points ago +10 / -4

You have the freedom to make your own value under capitalism. The government doesn't own you and assign a value to you.

You collectivist, big government fucks can all eat a bag of dicks.

-1
TheWestYearZero -1 points ago +3 / -4

You can't possibly believe that.

This is the same Coca Cola capitalism that destroys family life and declares whiteness as racism.

2
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 2 points ago +4 / -2

Please don't confuse cultural marxism and leftist corporatism with capitalism.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +7 / -10
6
Litecola2 6 points ago +8 / -2

That's not capitalism oh publik skool smoothbrain.

Crony capitalism / oligarchy / technocracy has held sway in the USA for decades, probably generations. Wake up, it's a uniparty. It's the deep state.

3
TheWestYearZero 3 points ago +4 / -1

The creation of limited liability ended capitalism as a good. It tyereafter became a vehicle for crime.

2
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 2 points ago +6 / -4

Neither of those things will happen, and I'll also die knowing that I was not a leftist piece of shit. That works for me.

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
5
Monkeybeardontcare 5 points ago +7 / -2

Why are you here? Your a leftist garbage shill? Go back to Reddit

6
RedditStillSucks 6 points ago +11 / -5

Yes. Because fascist germany ...never ever told a business what to produce. How much and How much to pay the workers.

Go away your just communist by another name. Falling for a different propaganda that tells you what you want to hear.

Pathetic.

2
randomusers239874 2 points ago +5 / -3

They didn't though, except in war time. This isn't a matter of opinion, it's recorded history. The Nazis even ended trade unions.

1
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 1 point ago +4 / -3

Sure they did. How do you think they managed to build a war machine than blitzed through Europe in only a few years? Hitler got the support of business owners by painting the Nazis as a preferable alternative to the communists and allowing them to keep ownership of their businesses, but the Nazi government exercised de facto control over the means of production as soon as Hitler was appointed as Chancellor. Look up the 1933 Act for the Formation of Compulsory Cartels.

2
randomusers239874 2 points ago +4 / -2

That act was about regulating already existing cartels. The pre-war economy actually looked quite similar to the US economy right now, which had private businesses with regulation. Yeah it's Wikipedia, but the article on the pre-war economy is pretty good https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Privatization_and_business_ties. Privatization was a priority, but so was economic protectionism, and there was a balance between the free market and state interests. This is how every country is run, including the US right now.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +8 / -10
6
RedditStillSucks 6 points ago +11 / -5

Translation: "fuck this dude is right. But i dont want to look bad. So ill just try to pretend im way smarter." Weird. Thats what liberal socialist do too. How odd that you guys are exactly the same in every respect.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +4 / -6
1
deleted 1 point ago +6 / -5
0
deleted 0 points ago +6 / -6
4
Dorko 4 points ago +4 / -0

There’s private property in China as there was in Nazi Germany. You just don‘t have the right to own it. The government can take it away whenever they want. China is very much like Nazi Germany. They’re already pressing territorial claims.

-5
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -5 points ago +2 / -7

You know what's up.

1
NoNewFrens 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ehh not really plus Natsoc is where it should be bring back old America

1
CaptainRumington 1 point ago +1 / -0

Play the Left's game. Change the meaning of Fascism to Free Association Service, Careers In Stems, Mmmm. Or some nonsense.

19
crazyjackel 19 points ago +22 / -3

The definition of Fascism that I operate with is "All within the state. Nothing outside the state. Nothing against the state"

I am very much for a limited State and rugged individual display of natural rights. Fascism is a no for me.

7
PraiseBeToScience 7 points ago +8 / -1

We had a limited state and rugged individual rights.

200 years later it collapsed due to the takeover if statists, degenerates, and communists.

Why would it be any different a second time around? "I just want to be left alone" really just means "I will do nothing to oppose your takeover".

Look at how many faggot boomers did literally nothing when Reagan stomped gun rights. And they're such faggots that decades later they still talk about him fondly.

-4
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -4 points ago +7 / -11

Your definition is outdated. Fascism has evolved a bit since 1925.

8
crazyjackel 8 points ago +10 / -2

You say that, but then you don't introduce your own.

1
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 1 point ago +7 / -6

OP is trying to sell fascism, a dead, failed leftist ideology, by pretending that it has evolved. It's laughably ridiculous.

1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 1 point ago +6 / -5

Have you never heard of Evola, retard?

-2
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -2 points ago +6 / -8

I've elaborated in other comments, feel free to read those.
I'm sick of repeating myself to a bunch of D'Souza readers.

8
whataboob 8 points ago +10 / -2

Fascism hasn’t evolved.

They simply destroyed the fascists minds by destroying the definitions of words.

Now they can be fascists without actually knowing it.

They are actual fascists, by instinct, and they don’t care that what they’re doing is “bad.”

They only care that they believe their behavior doesn’t suit neggy words like “fascist.”

They are actually fascists though, by the dictionary definition. They are using government to control business in their effort to destroy their political opposition.

That’s fascism. They are fascists. https://patriots.win/p/12hReMZyVy/x/c/4Dx5b3AqfwZ

6
d_bokk 6 points ago +8 / -2

Your definition is outdated. Fascism has evolved a bit since 1925.

Oh, it wasn't "real fascism," you say? lol, fucking commies never change.

-5
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -5 points ago +4 / -9

No, it was real fascism then, and it worked.
But what worked then won't work the same now, so it's been updated.

5
d_bokk 5 points ago +8 / -3

sounds fake and gay

14
utfanx2 14 points ago +20 / -6

Two wrongs don't make a right. if I'm going to fight, it will be for freedom.

9
TheWestYearZero 9 points ago +11 / -2

Freedom to pump porn into your children's smartphones?

That freedom?

Or some other freedom?

3
TheWestYearZero 3 points ago +7 / -4

I will only fight for my family.

Freedom is an abstract bullshit concept with 1,000 definitions.

But I know what my family is.

-14
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -14 points ago +11 / -25

Fascism is freedom.
Or are you somehow free in your permanent servitude to global finance and their selected regents?

8
utfanx2 8 points ago +11 / -3

Authoritarian same as communism, which is characterized by a suppression of opposition. Communists have a right to speak, even if they would deny others the same.

-10
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -10 points ago +5 / -15

Word salad

4
utfanx2 4 points ago +7 / -3

I didn't get called a nazi for 5 years just to make Hillary Clinton a prophet.

-3
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -3 points ago +4 / -7

5 years only?
Weak.

5
jubyeonin 5 points ago +6 / -1

Rigga wat

11
CynicalTwit22 11 points ago +22 / -11

No. It's not.

-14
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -14 points ago +11 / -25

It really is. You'll figure it out when you grow up.

3
CynicalTwit22 3 points ago +9 / -6

We're already living under it.

-4
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -4 points ago +14 / -18

No, we aren't. Fascism puts the nation first, not the globohomo finance agenda.
You are erroneously equating totalitarianism with fascism.

4
NotAPuma 4 points ago +10 / -6

Fascism puts the Government and Industry first, not the People.

-1
randomusers239874 -1 points ago +5 / -6

No, that's a misunderstanding of the philosophy. It actually forces business to support the stats FOR the peoples benefit. It's anticapitalist in the sense that businesses aren't allowed to exploit workers or resources, which is enforced by the state, but is otherwise a free market. This was of course before things like labor laws and such, which are technically "fascist" laws.

0
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 0 points ago +3 / -3

It actually forces business to support the stats FOR the peoples benefit.

That's a Democrat's wet dream right there.

-4
TheWestYearZero -4 points ago +3 / -7

Fascism put family and nation first.

2
NotAPuma 2 points ago +4 / -2

It put's them Second, under Fascism, the STATE is most important,

The Hierarchy in a STATE is Government, then Industry, then the People.

3
CynicalTwit22 3 points ago +7 / -4

So you're saying Trump was fascist?? Even though he didn't persecute or try to silence enemies??

-15
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -15 points ago +6 / -21

Trump had some tendencies that overlapped with a fascist worldview, yes.
Fascism doesn't necessitate persecution. You continue to erroneously equate totalitarianism with fascism.

6
TruthyBrat 6 points ago +9 / -3

That's because it generally is. It is not erroneous to see that.

-9
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -9 points ago +4 / -13

Every system of governance has the option to be totalitarian or not.
Except the Marxist strains, they're always totalitarian by necessity.
American "democracy" has become more totalitarian than even Nazi Germany at the height of the war.
Every modern democracy has become totalitarian, but it would still be erroneous to equate democracy with totalitarianism.

11
d_bokk 11 points ago +19 / -8

Fascism's symbol being a bundle of sticks isn't a coincidence. Takes a special kind of faggot to find the system preferable to a constitutional republic.

4
that_sound 4 points ago +7 / -3

And THAT is how you do a burn. Well done. You can see by their reply that you got under their skin. - spez: so much so that it got deleted. Ha!

And not to crap on your post, but I can't find anywhere else to put this.

https://i.maga.host/SI42H1w.png

What's hanging on the wall on either side of the flag?

I don't mention this to make a point. I have no point. I just find it interesting that people decided to put that on the wall of Congress. I have no clue why but always wondered.

-1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -1 points ago +5 / -6

What are you talking about? I didn't delete shit.
Can you not see my comment? I'll copy-paste it:

How's that cOnStItUtIoNaL rEpUbLiC been working out lately? Fucking retard.
Study Germany's economic recovery in the 30s and maybe you can begin to understand why fascism is the way forward.

2
that_sound 2 points ago +2 / -0

But why? If the mods deleted it once, they'll likely delete it again. Besides, any point that you're trying to make is overshadowed by the insult. Almost no one will hear anything but the insult.

You made a post to make a point. It was kind of low energy meh, but whatever. You got a little bit of pushback and you crapped all over your own thread with insults. That's not a good way to win people over to your thinking.

It's not very often these days that anyone gets a chance to say this, but you make fascism look bad.

-2
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

It actually doesn't even show deleted on my end. Some sort of shadow delete where it still looks like it's up, for me.
People do not respond to reasoned discourse. They need to be ridiculed.
The US is a fucking puppet state of the CCP, and he still calls it the "most powerful empire" evar. America hasn't successfully projected power in decades. It is a piggy bank being sucked dry by the world at large. Any person who believes the US is still the most powerful empire is an irredeemable moron who will never understand the necessity of fascism, and deserves nothing less than to be mocked and insulted.

-1
that_sound -1 points ago +1 / -2

It's deleted.

You make some points here that might be worth discussing, but you're just such an insufferable cunt. (See what I did there? See how it you just forgot the first part of the sentence? That's what you did all over this thread.)

"People do not respond to reasoned discourse. They need to be ridiculed." No, you're wrong. And as I try to frame an argument to convince you, I realize you won't listen so maybe you're right - fuck it. How you see the outside is to some extent a reflection of how you see yourself. It's true that many people (maybe you) don't respond to reasoned discourse, but some people do. Sometimes. But they won't ever if you are rude. Well, maybe you can be rude, but direct insults just puts a wall up. If you want to change people's minds you have to persuade them or at least make them curious. You are really bad at that. Here in this thread anyways. Phenomenally bad.

Even your points aren't that good - "puppet state" is a bit of an overstatement (at least right now), the US is still the most powerful empire (at least measured militarily), it has projected power in last decades, the US is being sucked dry most directly by a parasitic class (not the world at large)... And tho it would be good to discuss Chinese influence, and the loss of US influence and power, and how we are being sucked dry, there's no point trying to discuss any of of it with you because "any person who believes" that" is an irredeemable moron who will never understand blah blah blah - bored now.

And you've mentioned some authors (or something I dunno) who might be really smart and interesting and I might have done a websearch for if I was curious, but you made me uncurious.

No persuasion. No discussion. So no further thought on my end. And that's all on you and your insults. And maybe the worst part is, they aren't even good insults. You make fascism look bad.

0
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

You think you're making some meaningful point, but you're only showing that you're a fembrain.

1
that_sound 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well it's either that, or you're not bright enough to see my point. And as the insults are your basic message and you don't have much beyond that, I'm leaning towards the latter.

Either way, don't think too much about it. Your perspectives are clearly either too shallow or too fragile to discuss.

1
Buildtheadytum 1 point ago +5 / -4

ITT: Everybody arguing over semantics...wanting to clutch pearls about fascism in the same way people want to ban "assault weapons"...because 'fascism' looks and sounds scary.

My advice: ditch that language and just outline the principles you are espousing.

0
d_bokk 0 points ago +5 / -5

My advice, you aren't as smart as you think you are. There's nothing more effeminate than, following a loss, to squeal "ALL IS LOST! WE MUST CHANGE EVERYTHING!" because you're sad. You aren't talking about a difference in opinion, but a difference in a system of governance.

Do you know better than George Washington? James Madison? Thomas Paine? Patrick Henry? Of course you don't, you're a some loser on the internet who thinks being edgy makes you unique and intelligent. It doesn't, you're a collectivist. If anything, your ideology has more in common with King George.

3
Buildtheadytum 3 points ago +3 / -0

I haven't offered my ideology. My comments are on the conditioning around the word "fascism". You're willing to lash out at your compatriots, calling them losers, for simply discussing ideas.

If you're actually interested, I will state for the record that I believe that the U.S. Constitution is the greatest instrument of governance ever conceived of by man, clearly inspired by God. And George Washington is my most admired historical figure.

1
d_bokk 1 point ago +2 / -1

They're talking about the complete and utter dismantling of our constitutional republic. They aren't my compatriots, they have more in common with communists than you do with me.

1
ZoomerCrusader 1 point ago +3 / -2

The founding fathers themselves realized that we will all hang together or hang separately. A bundle of sticks is stronger than the individual sticks on their own. Communism is the abuse of the upper class by the lower. Capitalism is the abuse of the lower class by the upper. Fascism is the unification of both classes to work together to fight external threats. The laborer is worth nothing without the architect and the architect is worth nothing without the laborer.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +4 / -9
6
d_bokk 6 points ago +10 / -4

It's the most powerful empire the world has ever known and, despite the commu-fascist alliance's best efforts, it is still the freest nation in existence. So pretty damn well you unamerican faggot.

2
TheWestYearZero 2 points ago +5 / -3

Only one country fought Communism in WW2. And it wasn't the USA.

0
d_bokk 0 points ago +4 / -4

Fascism is just a less autistic version of communism. Maybe that's what the leftists mean by "real communism" -- fascism.

-4
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -4 points ago +6 / -10

Oh, I see. You're an unmitigated retard who hasn't processed the last 20 years into your understanding of America as it is, in reality.
Well, good luck.

3
d_bokk 3 points ago +8 / -5

I doubt you've seen anything, and if you did, you didn't understand it. Only an a marxist would come to the conclusion that our Constitution doesn't work and needs to be replaced.

-4
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -4 points ago +5 / -9

We can have a fascist system in America without needing to alter the Constitution. It really wouldn't be that difficult.

1
d_bokk 1 point ago +6 / -5

"This time it'll work! We just have to do it right!"

As I said, you sound like a marxist.

2
randomusers239874 2 points ago +5 / -3

Up until the genocide thing, Germany was actually doing pretty great by every measure. You might want to read up on pre-war economic policy and such.

1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 1 point ago +7 / -6

Fascism worked well enough last time that it took the combined might of the world to stop one country.
Fascism works. That's why you're indoctrinated to hate it.

11
Breadstick4 11 points ago +17 / -6

Fed

5
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 5 points ago +7 / -2

This place has been lit up lately with shills promoting leftist bullshit.

-7
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -7 points ago +7 / -14

"Everyone who tells a truth I don't like is a Fed!"
Maybe that's why Feds haven't come knocking on my door yet for the shit I post: they think I'm one of their own in deep cover, lol

2
Breadstick4 2 points ago +5 / -3

No i say it is a fedpost because everybody here agrees fascism is not the right move, we do not an authoritarian governemnt, whether it be communism/fascism/state capitalism (aka cronyism)/socialism/corporatism

I say fedpost because most posts like these are people trying to get others to agree to the bad idea and then take down the site because it is neofascists, we are not falling for the bait

-1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -1 points ago +5 / -6

Sorry to disappoint, but this is completely sincere.

3
Breadstick4 3 points ago +5 / -2

Big oof

0
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 0 points ago +4 / -4

pRoBlEmAtIc

9
NotAPuma 9 points ago +14 / -5

Leftist Shill, Get outta here, this is MAGA Country.

7
Titan93 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's a worthless word. Patriotism, law and order, constitution, and wisdom, not ideological poison are what we need, and what Trump gave his all to give us.

-1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -1 points ago +5 / -6

Patriotism, law and order, constitution, and wisdom don't mean much when your nation is subverted by global finance.
Add fascism and watch America flourish.

2
Titan93 2 points ago +3 / -1

China would team up with the communist Democrats and come demolish us. What the hell good is "fascism" going to do, and what do you mean by it.

1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 1 point ago +4 / -3

If we changed our monetary system to match Germany's in the 30s, China and the 5th-column Democrats wouldn't be enough to stop us.
When you stop the economic system in your country from actively fucking your nation, and its people, its amazing what can be accomplished.

7
GiveMe1776 7 points ago +8 / -1

No, we just need to follow the constitution

-2
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -2 points ago +4 / -6

Not sure if your vision or mine is a bigger fantasy at this point.

4
GiveMe1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

We are fighting fascists already

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

By fighting you mean doing nothing?

0
GoodGoyAward 0 points ago +1 / -1

And the entirety of our corrupt establishment approves while they laugh at you.

Keep fighting for your enemies, goy.

1
GiveMe1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

What? Fuck off commie shill

1
GoodGoyAward 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're literally parroting the most sacred belief of commies, the media, big tech, bankers, celebs, both corrupt political parties, academia, and major and international corporations...and I'm the commie shill?

Enjoy fighting for your enemies.

PS: you can virtue signal like a faggot all you want but they are still going to hate you and destroy America and call you a fascist while they're doing it.

1
GiveMe1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go jerk to some holocaust pics ((((((got))))))

1
GoodGoyAward 1 point ago +1 / -0

More dumb insults, huh? The hallmark of someone that's wrong.

Enjoy the future that's coming. You're fighting for it.

6
Rigged2020 6 points ago +8 / -2

Lol fuck off, the 1930's failed massively. They were anti-traditionalist, anti-clericalist and Anti-Christian modernists largely. Keynesians too, intact much of it was based on confused economics the idea that industry was so efficient demand would be fully satisfied and there would be too few jobs to be had, thus the government needed to step in. That isn't what happened, though they were right about Jobs offshoring to Asia.

A single despot has never provided good stable rule for a long period of time historically.

6
Herpawinski 6 points ago +6 / -0

HA! Good one. But 1) the truth is they don't hate fascism. They are outright fascists. They use violence, media and social coercion to instill socialism. That's actual fascism. 2) they play the game of dual definitions. They use their own definition of fascism knowing the general public has a different understanding (thanks to them in the first place). Their definition of "fascist" expressly includes the bourgeoise, the class of people who are economically and intellectually independent. Non communist intellectuals, academics and artists. Professional classes. Retailers who own their own shops, no matter how small. Own and operate your own shitty little taco truck? Congratulations, you're a fascist.

-1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -1 points ago +5 / -6

The people who are coordinating the street-rat variety "anti-fascists" hate actual fascism because they know it will subvert their financial power.
Hitler proved you can leave the gold standard and flourish, and that's why we are all taught to hate him today.

0
randomusers239874 0 points ago +2 / -2

I'm upvoting you, but Hitler wasn't that great on some stuff. He was a German nationalist, and attacked other white countries to make room for more Germans, so he technically was a race traitor. It would be unwise to divide ourselves like that again.

-1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -1 points ago +4 / -5

Poland attacked first. He never wanted war. Not joking at all. Read about the Danzig Corridor.

5
randomusers239874 5 points ago +6 / -1

Nah sorry, the expansion into the neighboring countries was planned long before the first battle. The war economy started producing tanks and armament long before the first shot was fired, at levels not needed for a simple standing army. He also wrote about the need for German imperialism, and lamented the fact that Germany had become a "Slav" state in Mein Kampf. He was a German nationalist through and through, which did cause him to be a race traitor.

-1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -1 points ago +3 / -4

The Poles had been saying since June 1939 that they were going to force Germany into a war, whether Germany wanted it or not. Hitler repeatedly sued for peace, and was refused because he wouldn't go back to the gold standard.

3
randomusers239874 3 points ago +4 / -1

Look man, you and I are on the same page on a lot of things, but Hitler was an imperialist. It's a matter of historical fact, and that attitude was common at the time. He was not perfect, so stop trying to defend all of his actions. He was a race traitor and killed more whites than any other group of people for his personal ethnic group. Hell, that's why my grandfather fought in WW2, the Germans kicked him of his land to make room for German citizens. We can accept the tenants of the underlying philosophy without accepting the implementation of it.

-2
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -2 points ago +3 / -5

I'm just stating facts. He was forced into war. Whether he would have gone to war on his own or not, that's what happened. He repeatedly tried to stop the bloodshed, because he knew it was whites being killed en masse, but he was refused because Churchill cared more about satisfying global finance than actually having peace.
That's what happened. I'm not placing value judgments.

-1
TheWestYearZero -1 points ago +1 / -2

Absolutely correct. Poland wanted war and wanted Britain in so that they could sieze more German territory.

They also didn'tvwant thePolish ews back that they had shipped to Germany.

5
Monkeybeardontcare 5 points ago +7 / -2

Why is this getting upvoted?

4
semblanceofsanity 4 points ago +5 / -1

I can only hope that people find it amusing purely in an edgelord "throw the commies from helicopters" sort of way and don't realize OP is a fag and wants to replace our republic with actual fascism.

-4
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -4 points ago +1 / -5

We can keep the Constitution and have a fascist system. They really aren't mutually exclusive.

3
madamaw 3 points ago +3 / -0

He seems like the kind of guy with a bunch of fake accounts to upvote his own stupid dogshit.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
2
somethingnew 2 points ago +3 / -1

My guess is some sort of Fuentes brigade. They like to do that from time to time.

1
Monkeybeardontcare 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is that?

2
ZoomerCrusader 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nick Fuentes was instrumental in organizing stop the steal rallies across the country with Alex Jones. Anyone countersignalling him is a degenerate/shill.

2
somethingnew 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nick Fuentes. He's some kid who has a youtube channel and some sort of podcast or something? Anyways he has a bunch of fans who come in here every once in a while to brigade. They stay for a few days and push stuff like this post then leave.

0
Monkeybeardontcare 0 points ago +1 / -1

Can you imagine being such a loser that you have to go troll others to feel accepted? What a bunch of bundles of sticks.

2
somethingnew 2 points ago +2 / -0

They aren't really trolling, they actually believe this stuff. They just brigade here to recruit people to their side.

0
TheWestYearZero 0 points ago +3 / -3

Because people wanrt a system that respects family life and a homogenous and not degenerate national cultural iidentity

-6
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -6 points ago +1 / -7

Because people want a system of governance that works.

3
Monkeybeardontcare 3 points ago +5 / -2

An example of that would be.....

-6
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -6 points ago +2 / -8

Fascism.

4
Monkeybeardontcare 4 points ago +6 / -2

Which Fascist state ? Holy moly how old are you? Seriously? WHAT FASCIST STATE IS THE EXAMPLE YOUR SPEAKING OF? What state is so successful that you’re using as an example?

-6
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -6 points ago +2 / -8

Germany.

5
AntsCamera 5 points ago +8 / -3

Facism and communism both end in state run means of production.

The only difference is facism co ops and intimidates industry through threats and coercion, whereas Communism takes it over outright.

Either way it becomes inefficient and prone to corruption, as anything government controlled does. every beaurocrat along the way has to take his "piece"/

Please read Gulag Archepelago. 80 hours on audiobook free on you tube, his whole works free. No excuse.

3
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 3 points ago +7 / -4

Been meaning to read that, didn't know there was a free audiobook on youtube. Thanks for the tip.
And I'd recommend you read Evola to understand modern fascism, as opposed to 1920s fascism, and see why it would be beneficial to us today.

5
donjuanluis07 5 points ago +7 / -2

..or you understand that Fascism is Marxism the same way Communism is Marxism. Then you understand that Marxist have one agenda, Deconstruction, ie. break it all down and destroy it all. So the best way to do that is to create two sides that you own, and get people on either side and let them kill each other. But that would mean actually knowing what Marx taught, what his teacher Hegel taught about the Dialetic, and what his acolytes did for the last 100 years. But no, lets do the same thing the Democrats do and destroy our nation and our understanding of reality because we are idiots.

Seriously getting frustrated with this site.

-3
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -3 points ago +2 / -5

Another D'Souza reader who doesn't know shit about modern fascism.

4
antimatter 4 points ago +10 / -6

That only makes sense from a retarded leftist view. deport.

-3
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -3 points ago +5 / -8

Deport yourself from life, faggot

4
paradox123 4 points ago +7 / -3

Don't bother explaining those subtle concepts here.

Most people unknowingly use the term fascism as a cool way to call someone a totalitarian.

But it's great to use the enemies of communism as a generic insult instead of calling them communists

3
WhiteTrashJesus 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is a point but fascism isn't what the USA is meant to be as much as a last resort imo. Like from what I understand an example of fascism would be if Donald had mandated Boy Scouts and Girls Scouts for every child, and had them al learn American values, having a public dress code and arresting people for being communist sympathisers. Would it work? Yes. Does it depend on the belief system of the people running it? Yes. Is it constitutional? Probably not. Ideally we could MAGA without taking away people's freedoms, but when you have so much subversion fascism seems like a better option than the alternative. And no the Nazi's murder of various groups of people was not part of fascism, that was out of control. The invading of other countries was, however.

It pisses me off when Donald is called a fascist because he purposely wasn't one, and that's why he wasn't able to MAGA. Sometimes you think if he was a little more everyone would thank him for it.

3
JBlaze056 3 points ago +3 / -0

They say they hate it, but they love it. As long as it is their policies being put upon people by the state. That is why they are so happy woke cultural, presently in the form of intersectionality, is making its way through the institutions; both governmental and societal.

3
clarkisland 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oswald Mosley was an honorable man with good intentions. He seemed to have wanted the best for the British people and he courageously named the financial elite in Britain and New York as the true enemy of the people even though doing so would destroy him in the end. He was the Donald Trump of his time and he paid dearly for it. I have no idea if or how a Fascist system would work in America and I doubt we will ever have to worry about it anyways.

2
Trumpy_Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or, you know, they're fucking retards that don't actually know what "fascist" means.

2
Briben 2 points ago +6 / -4

The people destroying our country are fascists. Mussolini, the creator of the word, saw fascism as a cooperation between big business and government to control all production and all media and to stamp out resistance to centralized ownership and messaging. We are there now.

-1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -1 points ago +5 / -6

Democracy was created by the Greeks, and they saw it as only allowing landed men to vote. Do we still define democracy that way? No. Democracy has evolved, as has fascism. Catch up.

2
semblanceofsanity 2 points ago +5 / -3

Everything within the state, nothing against the state, nothing outside the state? Miss me with that bullshit. There's nothing patriotic or American about fascism. It's a pejorative used by marxists in an attempt to recurve people into thinking that limited government is somehow oppressive. Deport this shit.

-1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -1 points ago +5 / -6

Goddamn, everyone acts like understanding one quote of 1920s fascism translates to understanding modern fascism.

2
Insanejub 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you saying we need to look to, and emulate, authoritarian fascistic governmental interventions to stop the authoritarian fascistic commie retards because the authoritarian fascistic commie retards on the Left are being authoritative fascistic commie retards?

Like, we should try to utilize the US government that is now almost completely control by these same authoritative fascistic commie retards?

What the fuck are you trying to say here?

Because it comes off as a fake call to action that the authoritative fascistic commie retards would make to then point the finger at us and proclaim, “lOokS! SeE tHeY aRe fAsCiStS!”

1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

They already call us fascists. Let's act like it, cleanse our enemies, fix and fortify our government, and clean our children's brains of the globohomo filth.

1
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 1 point ago +3 / -2

The people destroying and subverting our country wouldn't know fascism if they looked in a mirror; they are the closest thing to fascism in our country.

1
crazyjackel 1 point ago +2 / -1

Look, I am going to give you one advice: just write a second post explaining how fascism works and make up another word for it without the negative connotations.

My grandfather was a survivor of the Holocaust and I can never support fascism. I will however support things that are inline with the constitution and are effective. I want to hear what you want to say. Give me your own damn definition in another post and we can go from there on a meaningful conversation instead of buzzword soup.

I believe that we are in a Weimar state of the republic. Dr Michael Burry has reported on this and posted up a recession timeline. As an economist, he is typically someone I trust to make good predictions on massive macro events. In this case, the prediction being hyper inflation finishing its gestation period and manifesting, slow at first, but accelerating as it comes. It is innate to the markets which congress, the president, and the federal reserve have no real power over.

There is going to be a power vacuum, no matter what as millions lose their jobs. People will be loathe to return to the system as it was. I, typically would advocate more for a libertarian position at that time, pointing to the actions of the federal reserve and congress in making the crisis even worse. But I want to know about what other positions would advocate for in such a power vacuum. I am pretty familiar with the neo-socialist position, which will collapse into total state control of production if they so succeed in convincing a desperate public. I want to be aware of the neo-fascist position that you are advocating for and how it is different from the neo-socialists, except with the allowance of private property.

1
runeu 1 point ago +1 / -0

No two people seem to have the same definition of fascism, but most agree it is totalitarian. I dont care a lot about what things are called. I'd support The Poopie Diaper party/ideology as long as it meant a nationalistic, constitutional republican democracy. But calling yourself fascist is inviting the ire of all who love liberty.

1
BroadSunlitUplands 1 point ago +1 / -0

Associating with fascism is a) retarded because fascism is retarded and b) a complete non-starter in America.

1
madamaw 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, thanks.

"FaScIsM HaZ EvOlVeD!" Lol I guess the dumbshits that fall for it haven't though. I'd rather the whole world get nuked than let commies or fascists win. Could you imagine people like this fucking nerd in charge of the economy? I'd suicide bomb his ass so hard.

1
Marielle_Redclaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, wasn't this a Star Trek episode?

1
yudsfpbc 1 point ago +3 / -2

Part of the symbology of the United States is the Roman fasces, a bundle of sticks signifying unity and power through mutual support.

"Join or die" as Franklin famously put it.

1
antimatter 1 point ago +5 / -4

Seriously, 300 some odd upvotes on this post. We have a commie infestation problem on patriots.win now.

2
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 2 points ago +4 / -2

Things have been really fucked here today, not just this post. Hopefully it gets sorted out.

-2
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

Not just today, but over the past few days, there has been a vibe change. Maybe Coke telling people to be less White has something to do with it. I think even civic nationalist retards are starting to understand that they're the only ones not fighting in the everlasting race war.

-2
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -2 points ago +3 / -5

Well, people who love their country want a system of governance that actually works, so....

1
remember1776 1 point ago +2 / -1

Can't tell if sarcastic or not

1
Skyking772002 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it still fascism if it’s “democratic fascism”?

0
Slugbert 0 points ago +4 / -4

Fascism is the disease. Populism is the cure.

0
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 0 points ago +7 / -7

Fascism is populist.

1
TheWestYearZero 1 point ago +4 / -3

Of course. They don't understand.

No more than the seal understands why he claps.

-1
hunterhiden -1 points ago +1 / -2

Fascism is what happens when communists take over. Projection is what these people do. What they hate is always what they’re doing themselves.

-2
Monkeybeardontcare -2 points ago +6 / -8

Fascist is Marxism for the country not the world. Fuck you leftist.

3
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 3 points ago +8 / -5

You really have no clue what fascism is, at all.
That D'Souza bullshit would be accurate if we were talking about 1920s fascism, but fascism has evolved in the past century.

2
Monkeybeardontcare 2 points ago +4 / -2

Evolved would mean that fascist god other and talked about their philosophy. And then it would change to what they started agreeing on and what got popular. That’s not what happened . Leftists started using the difference between fascism and communism to try to hide the fact that ALL LEFTISM /MARXISM WAS A DELEGITIMIZED by trying to make Marxism different than fascism they to legitimacy to Marxism by denigrating Fascism ( because WW2 made sure the world knew that Marxism had failed) instead people who didn’t know what fascism was started hearing the leftist Try to require history and believed them. I’m sorry but your definition of Fascism is what George Washington and Thomas Jefferson believed. That’s not what Fascism is

2
SleeplessInSeattle [S] 2 points ago +6 / -4

It actually did happen, but given your apparent level of understanding, I doubt you've heard of Evola, or even Mosley.
WW2 wasn't what disproved Marxism, it was Lenin's Russian Revolution that showed Marxism to be actual horseshit.
WW2 proved the power of fascism. It took a global coalition to destroy fascist Germany. Germany was overwhelmingly powerful because they fashioned an economic system that didn't put the nation second to subversive parasites.

1
TheWestYearZero 1 point ago +3 / -2

Only one country in WW2 fought the commies. And it wasn't the USA.

-6
TakenusernameA -6 points ago +2 / -8

Nah, we need a theocracy or a monarchy. Fascism is gay leftist crap.

0
TheWestYearZero 0 points ago +3 / -3

Perhaps you should look into Falangism.

-1
SleeplessInSeattle [S] -1 points ago +4 / -5

I can dig that. But modern fascism is quite a far distance from leftism.