Also you can't compare FUCKING NASA GRADE solar panels with commercial-grade solar panels. They are MUCH MUCH more efficient, not because it's unobstructed, but because of the technology they use. Their panels have probably double the efficiency of regular ones
Yeah, let's compare performance of panels receiving unobstructed by atmosphere sunlight to performance of panels covered by snow
Also you can't compare FUCKING NASA GRADE solar panels with commercial-grade solar panels. They are MUCH MUCH more efficient, not because it's unobstructed, but because of the technology they use. Their panels have probably double the efficiency of regular ones
Sadly no, the panels on the ISS are roughly 14% efficient. Most home solar panels are in the 10-15% range, with the premium models pushing 20%.
Oddly, the 14% panels on the ISS weren't even the best available when they went up.
I was mainly talking about satellites, ISIS is pretty old. Though I'm sure they could upgrade the solar panels someday.