3717
Comments (283)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

"one that's supported by our own military leaders."

There is no evidence that I'm aware of that supports this statement.

There's also no evidence that the military is actually going to uphold their oaths and defend the country from what appears to be a foreign attack.

My only conclusion is to assume that no action will come from that front and work on the grass roots stuff, but we still don't know.

3
Scooby 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think it's treason to not have used the insurrection act. That's on Trump or it's on the Military Industrial Complex at the Pentagon/DoD for not backing him. If Trump could have done it, I think he would have. His own VP stabbed him in the back. At least we know who was "familiar with Trump's thinking" now.

We've likely been attacked by a biological weapon as a means to remove a populist president using election fraud. The coup is being understated by too many people. We're back to doing memes defending Ted Cruz while completely ignoring that he didn't object to the electors from GA despite fractional votes, negative votes, vote switching, 90% adjudication, fake watermain breaks, CCTV security camera footage of smoking gun fraud, dead voters, underage voters, USB updates, etc... Rand Paul didn't object either. Not a single senator did. The entire senate is beholden. The White House is beholden. The Supreme Court is beholden. So is the DoJ, FBI, and CIA. They are all assets of the machine, the deep state. Putin was not joking when he stated 'America begins it's Bolshevik revolution just as Russia did in 1917' right after Trump was elected. They are doing it by the book, right down to Operation Trust. They needed a high ranking guy like Flynn to look like the resistance. "They've got six ways to Sunday to get at you." I don't know why I'm ranting but I keep remembering "If only they knew how bad it really was."

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm with you most of the way through this post, but I stop short of concluding that Flynn was somehow comped. We have no evidence of that. What it's starting to look like is that actions like the Insurrection Act were indeed on the table, but Trump was hindered by blockaded by people like Meadows. Why the military hasn't acted yet is my biggest frustration. The threat couldn't be more clear and their Constitutional duty more obvious, but we have seen nothing. I can only conclude that any possible action has been blocked by a very potent enemy. So I'm working on the grass roots stuff to see if we can turn this tide.

1
Make_More 1 point ago +1 / -0

While it's believable that Trump was hindered to use the Insurrection Act, I would like to see some more evidence for this before I believe it. I think Trump would just have told us this, if this was the case.