3636
Comments (487)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
79
TrudopesEyebrow 79 points ago +79 / -0

For what it’s worth Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch dissented.

These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle," Thomas wrote. "The refusal to do so is inexplicable."
Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch in a separate dissent also wrote that the court could provide clarity on the question by taking up the cases.
"They present an important and recurring constitutional question: whether the Elections or Electors Clauses of the United States Constitution are violated when a state court holds that a state constitutional provision overrides a state statute governing the manner in which a federal election is to be conducted," Alito wrote. ":That question has divided the lower courts, and our review at this time would be greatly beneficial."

103
VenusDe 103 points ago +103 / -0

Kavannaugh and ACB did not.

Those were the 2 votes needed.

Fuck them.

47
p8riot 47 points ago +48 / -1

I told y'all ACB had dead eyes and sounded like a fucking libtard. Downvoted of course.

30
ManBadOrange 30 points ago +31 / -1

I knew she was trouble when I heard her say fentanyl Floyed died from "muh racism". Pathetic cunt , her and Kuckanah

25
p8riot 25 points ago +25 / -0

I knew when she COULDN'T RECOUNT ALL FIVE PROTECTIONS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Unbelievable the mental backflips people made to excuse that.

7
chahn1138 7 points ago +7 / -0

I fear the Left Broke Brett.

9
Julius_Severus 9 points ago +12 / -3

Who could have possibly thought that a woman who spends her spare time importing Haitians into America would turn out to be useless?

20
jeffwingersballs 20 points ago +20 / -0

Someone on Gab said you only needed four to force a review of the case.

10
VenusDe 10 points ago +10 / -0

Neither one was the fourth so fuck them both.

7
AndrewCuomosEmmy 7 points ago +7 / -0

Four to hear, five to actually win the case.

6
jeffwingersballs 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hearing the case is not the endgame, but it would have been a W.

18
deleted 18 points ago +19 / -1
5
Mooma 5 points ago +5 / -0

One vote was need to hear the case

3
VenusDe 3 points ago +3 / -0

and neither one of them voted to hear it.

4
StartAgain 4 points ago +5 / -1

Cuckvanaugh

28
whippeat 28 points ago +28 / -0

Wtf Kavanaugh

After the way Kamala treated him during his nomination hearing. He didn’t even want to hear the case? What the fuck

12
BasedNtruth 12 points ago +12 / -0

They got to him, probably right after he got his seat.

7
NormalCupcake 7 points ago +7 / -0

Probably made a deal to get the seat in the first place.

4
BurgerChef90 4 points ago +4 / -0

They totally got to him AFTER. Probably told him "If you think this confirmation hearing is bad, just wait and see what we'll do if you cross us."

3
AmannamedRJ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Im at the point where i PRAY SCOTUS gets stacked. I'm tired of pretending our republic is still functional. If one of the 3 balances in the checks and balances gets stacked by the majority party we're officially illegitimate according to the constitution.

2
BillDBlasiosBlackSon 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a good point. Accelerationism has it's place in the our history.

"When in the Course of Current Events..."

-Declaration of Independence

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
16
Berkeley 16 points ago +16 / -0

What happened to the other two Trump judges?

21
Moewrawn 21 points ago +21 / -0

Cucked out because they're human garbage?

7
AmannamedRJ 7 points ago +7 / -0

They're establishment choices that Trump went with to appease the Swamp GOP. In fact most of his cabinet's history is just that. If by some miracle we get Trump or somebody similar again we NEED to be clear that the time for "party politics" is fucking OVER. Get the god damn job done. Fuck party. Fuck politics.

-10
AllTheWayTrump -10 points ago +4 / -14

Yes, but apparently they also declared that too few votes were impacted to make a difference in the outcome. Sorry motherfuckers.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
10
ObamasLooseButthole 10 points ago +10 / -0

It’s amazing how the courts can make those kinds of assumptions without hearing a single shred of the evidence. Almost like they’re bought and paid for by the side that cheated.