2622
Comments (112)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
94
PatriotPen 94 points ago +94 / -0

She definitely is a traitor. Because of her, and only her decision (they needed her to make 4 to be heard), she has single-handedly and completely demolished the judicial and democratic process in this country. Cowardly bitch.

51
Scuffers 51 points ago +51 / -0

Cowardice is the norm these days..

it's too easy for these cowards to hid behind process etc...

ACB was installed at great political cost to Trump (along with Gorsuch and Kavanaugh) and yet they have all been complete cowards.

39
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 39 points ago +41 / -2

Shoulda picked a man.

17
IncredibleMrE1 17 points ago +19 / -2

REEEEEEEEEEEE (you are not wrong)

5
LadyPede23 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah real men. The other idiots have vigina faces too

6
Palazzolo1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Do you mean another Thomas?

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
10
TangerineShine 10 points ago +10 / -0

I don’t think traitor is the right word. We need judges who don’t always side with their political party. Activist judges have fucked our country up worse than the politicians.

Now if we were searching for words: fuck head bitch seems fitting

5
ZacPetkanas 5 points ago +5 / -0

We need judges who don’t always side with their political party.

I hear you, but that's David French level thinking. The left is not playing by the rules, French et al want to lose gracefully.

George Washington didn't play by the Redcoat's rules, he crossed the Delaware on Christmas and killed them. We've got to think that way

Edit: me am smart

1
TangerineShine 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess my point was really directed at use of the word “Traitor”. If we truly believe in our constitution it is important that we uphold our own values.

Speech is entirely different. I now call everyone who betrays our country, a child molester. It’s certainly not unconstitutional. But if these originalist, textualist judges are declining to hear these suits, It casts doubt on the suit itself. The shitty part is we’ve seen the evidence. We know fraud exists. We’re battling red tape and bureaucracy bull shit. This directly tells the tale of past case rulings, and unconstitutional laws which should have been challenged years ago.

2
coffee_grdr 2 points ago +2 / -0

at this point, it might be fair to say that there are no lawyers or judges that respect the constitution!

every lawyer and judge was educated in a left wing system that told them that feelings matter. that it was okay to go against the law/constitution if you're intentions were to be the good guy and help the down trodden.