1726
posted ago by SicsempertyrannisTX ago by SicsempertyrannisTX +1726 / -0

i cant believe for one second we believed she would stand for conservative values what a fuckin silly joke shes just as much a leftist commie as anyone else

Comments (155)
sorted by:
137
UnemployedMarx 137 points ago +137 / -0
  • Women
  • Adopted foreign black kids
  • Modern Catholic
  • Actually respects the current Pope

Should have all been warning signs.

55
MAGAlorian 55 points ago +56 / -1

No shit. Many were trying to warn about this at the time. The Catholic Church invented 'social justice'.

32
The_Litehaus_Abides 32 points ago +32 / -0

At this point, I actually think this bitch would vote in favor of abortion, so I'm going to delete the post I made about her after she was confirmed.

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
4
zaku 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jesuits are sadly part of the Catholic church and the pope is a Jesuit.

2
zaku 2 points ago +2 / -0

But just like the word gay, it was hijacked by the left.

2
Sl0re10 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everyone always takes this wrong but I would say no. Marx basically took the middle ages Church argument of a perfect society and secularised it. There were regular communist revolts in middle ages Europe... but they were religious. The weaver revolts in Germany gave him the idea of the proletariat to mix in.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
7
Kn33l2Dominion 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nobody here wanted her when Trump made the pick. I can't remember her name now but the Cuban judge from Miami should have been his pick.

7
champdog 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yep, one pro-gun dissenting opinion on a case and everyone decided she was MAGA.

-47
deleted -47 points ago +5 / -52
21
UnemployedMarx 21 points ago +22 / -1

I edited it like immediately after I made the mistake but the editing sucks on this website.

I am anti-modern Catholicism. Modern Catholics are woke jokes. The current Pope is a marxist. Sedevacantists have the right idea. Vatican I and II are complete disasters. Catholicism died in the 1800s.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +6 / -11
20
neverreddit 20 points ago +22 / -2

I live in a Catholic area and all the "Catholics" are pro-abortion, pro-SJW, pro-socialism. I mean look at the current Pope. Also, this is verifiable by actual statistics. Most Catholics are actually ok with abortion and vote left.

2
deleted 2 points ago +6 / -4
1
ThunderSizzle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Faithful Catholics?

Ask if they believe in the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist. Ask them if they regular go to confession, especially before receiving the Eucharistic. Ask them if they go to mass every Sunday, and sometimes daily mass, if possible.

If they don't answer yes, then they aren't faithful Catholics. They may be catholic by definition, but they are as practicing as a rino is maga.

A catholic that doesn't go to mass isn't in good standing.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
9
GarudaDarkblack 9 points ago +10 / -1

So Biden is an anti-Catholic Catholic but still got around 50% of the Catholic vote. So what you are telling us is that roughly 50% of Catholics vote against Catholic values. Combine that with your disgrace of a Pope and it looks like Catholics as a whole are a woke joke. You are shooting yourself in the foot and claiming it is to bleed the toxins out.

4
neverreddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

What does them voting for Trump or Biden have to do with their position on abortion? You can literally look it up. Most Catholics are ok with abortion. The Pope is an agent straight from hell. And no, that’s no mason speaking.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
8
DavidBowieRapedKids 8 points ago +8 / -0

The Catholic church is compromised.

Here's the nativity scene they decided to display last Christmas. https://i.maga.host/I4l4oEr.png It's fucking demonic. Pure mockery.

You might jack off the Church Militant who I'm pretty sure is another Catholic, closeted gay, but it's impossible to defend the Catholic church these days.

How many pedos do they have to shelter and protect for you to wake up?

The Protestant Reformation didn't just fall out of the sky. Oh and by the way they're still offering indulgences... for fucking twitter follows.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
3
romanhelmet 3 points ago +3 / -0

worship in a langue they don’t speak

LMAO...Who worships in a language??

It's all spiritual!! You just proved you're not up to the task and blew your entire argument...

1 Down vote for you and 1 up vote for the other side..that's TWO points to the other side.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
2
romanhelmet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Neither did God and he's on my side.

The Vatican simply makes changes to suit them just to increase subscription numbers and tidings. Purely an unholy business decision.

And you sinned when you lied about not knowing what to say to a person...

Apparently its a very uneducated "You boob".

2
TownHallBall 2 points ago +3 / -1

He's anti-communist cocksucking pedophiles. So in a way, you're correct. Fuck your cult.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
2
TownHallBall 2 points ago +3 / -1

Lolll. You’re right! I can’t abide pedophiles or their apologists.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
DrNilesCrane___ 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm anti Catholic. Fuck those child diddlers. The Pope is a fraud and up to his eyeballs in child trafficking.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
DrNilesCrane___ 1 point ago +1 / -0

You call me a "bigot" as if that means anything to me. That's hilarious. Call me a bigot, call me a racist, call me whatever you want. At least I don't get a hard on for a satanic piece of shit hiding out in the vatican.

1
ThunderSizzle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus gave the keys to Peter, who passed it through the papacy.

But Peter wasn't perfect, and many popes were downright evil, but the Office that Jesus established still exists.

Because the person isn't the office. If it was, we were doomed from the second Jesus left us.

I can say the Vatican is one of the most corrupt places on Earth, and desire it's fixing, and still be a devout Catholic that respects the authority God placed in the church. And that's why I dont give a penny to any general diocesan fund though.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
DrNilesCrane___ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep I'm a bigot. Who cares? Your words mean nothing.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
Dogpile1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Another catholic pedo heard from.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
28
Judiwont 28 points ago +29 / -1

The adopted Haitians should have given it away.

11
MoldyLocksNesMonste 11 points ago +16 / -5

It did.

But you are misjudging the constant trump dick sucking that "pedes" who thought everything was 48D chess.

4
DrNilesCrane___ 4 points ago +4 / -0

No shit. That's what made me dislike her from the start. There's a lot of American babies who need homes... Adopt one of them.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
19
StartAgain 19 points ago +28 / -9

Yeah i'm pissed that Trump decided to pick a woman for a SCOTUS justice. Women are almost always commies & are weak as fuck

25
deplorabetty 25 points ago +27 / -2

He picked Kavanaugh too. So yeah, men are also weak and commies.

12
StartAgain 12 points ago +13 / -1

cuckvanaugh can no longer be considered a real man

10
FakeNametag 10 points ago +10 / -0

Kavanaugh's new defense against the rape claims: "I like men"

4
StartAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly

4
neverreddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

I mean, that was a real catastrophe. You can just tell looking at him that he's a fucking spineless cuck.

4
Titan93 4 points ago +4 / -0

He likes beer and throwing elections

3
Mraboman3 3 points ago +5 / -2

Some men are weak, even most, but I’ve yet to see a woman rule and make sound tough decisions ever. I just feel the great qualities (not pandering) that make a good woman, make them unfit to lead. And I mean that wholeheartedly. I think almost EVERY strong male leader needs a woman to co lead 60/40

Male lead- we need oil, they got oil, we bigger, let’s take their shit Woman: no one needs to die, let’s ask them nicely to share Conclusion: fine, well threaten them 1st. “Share or else”

Woman lead: we need oil but we don’t have any..GREEN! Beta male: okay honey

And don’t get it twisted, we WANT the compassionate woman. Imagine trump with Hilary

Trump: Canada’s prime minister called me orange Hillary: he pretty much played you. I know my Donnie isn’t no bitch

3
krzyzowiec 3 points ago +3 / -0

No such thing as co-leading. You are either leading or you aren't.

0
Mraboman3 0 points ago +1 / -1

Incorrect, but ok

4
krzyzowiec 4 points ago +4 / -0

In what sense? Someone ultimately has to be the decider or nothing gets done. That's why the Supreme Court is not evenly split, and why the President ultimately makes the calls instead of having to consult the VP each time.

And that's why the family is properly led when the man is in charge. It's either that or the woman is in charge, which ultimately leads to disaster.

1
Mraboman3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe not a country. But other things. I’ve seen 33% ownership plenty

1
krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes but in situations of conflict, you have rules that determine the outcome or point to the person who determines the outcome. That is the leader. Why is that the case? Because no one wants a situation of ambiguity. I guarantee you in any situation where you have 33% ownership, either someone else has majority ownership or there is some contract that stipulates what happens in a disagreement between equal owners. (or you go to court and a judge decides)

3
krzyzowiec 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember that rally where he asked the crowd if his pick should be a woman or a man? The crowd cheered when he said woman, and hardly anyone said anything when he said man. He then called all the men in the crowd cowards.

Trump delivered exactly what was asked of him. Not his fault people are weak and confused and believe women should be judges for no reason now.

3
StartAgain 3 points ago +3 / -0

Real leader would say that women rule too much with their feelings and should not be added (unless it's Boebert, Owens, Powell, etc)

3
krzyzowiec 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump has always been trying to do what people want. He was just a conduit for the people of this country to have their voices heard and be represented. Before he ran, all he did was listen to radio shows and hear people's complaints about this country. He didn't do this for himself.

He asked people what they wanted, and he kept hearing 'female judge'. Blame Trump supporters for being too beta to do the right thing, not Trump for listening to them.

2
zaku 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think he did it so the media doesn't accuse whoever he appoints as a "sex offender" or something like that. So there is not another Kavanaugh situation again.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does God force people to make the right decisions, or decide for them? Or does he allow you to suffer should you choose the wrong path?

2
becky21k1 2 points ago +2 / -0

The strategy there was mostly "they can't accuse a woman of rape" and "they can't accuse us of sexism replacing Darth Bader with a man"

-7
PankekGirl -7 points ago +7 / -14

Men who are weak as fuck say shit like this about women.

Grow the fuck up.

7
StartAgain 7 points ago +12 / -5

No, weak men simp

8
deleted 8 points ago +10 / -2
7
PKShadilay 7 points ago +7 / -0

The magic triangle 🔺️

3
neverreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

it's both. Weak men simp and men made bitter by rejection hate all women. It's not better than the feminazis who hate all men because they're too ugly (inside and out) to get the kind of man they want.

2
GarudaDarkblack 2 points ago +2 / -0

You aren't wrong but you are only looking at extremes. There is the middle ground where men learn the true nature of women through years of experience. In general you don't want a woman in charge. That doesn't mean all women are poor leaders (South Dakota governor) or that all men are good leaders (no example needed), but in general you will have a much harder time finding a woman that has the character traits you would look for in a good leader than finding a man with those same traits. Men and women are different and they shine in different roles.

1
2016TrumpMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will not vote for a female primary candidate for the same reason that I will not vote for a mormon - there have been a few good ones in office, but the vast majority are worse than shit. I play the odds.

1
neverreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

100% agree. Just tired of the “all women are horrible” lines by the incels today.

3
PresidentPussyGraber 3 points ago +3 / -0

As a dude that has slept with more than most, let me reassure all the incels... All women are horrible

0
neverreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’ve slept with so many women, like so many, hundreds, thousands even...sure dude.

1
GarudaDarkblack 1 point ago +1 / -0

They've been hurt like most of us and are overcompensating for all the anti-male propaganda and the laws that discriminate against men. They have every right to feel the way they do but extremism doesn't help their cause. I pity them, and not in a condescending way. Perhaps it is more accurate to say I have empathy for them.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
aqua27 14 points ago +14 / -0

Another bad pick from Trump courtesy of the Deep State

13
ObamasLooseButthole 13 points ago +13 / -0

Trump had other choices, Barrett wasn’t the only one on the list.

So he has some fault in it as well.

3
geotus3000 3 points ago +3 / -0

The list was 100% Communists who all are interchangeable.

9
ObamasLooseButthole 9 points ago +9 / -0

And he didn’t do a damn thing to fight against that. The man has made mistakes and just picking their judges was a huge one.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
12
DontGiveUp 12 points ago +12 / -0

People on here were warning us when Trump was still deciding and when he finally chose her, many on here told all dissenters to shut up about concerns because Trump chose her.

11
SigSauer1776 11 points ago +11 / -0

The Dems knew she was on their side the entire time

1
PKShadilay 1 point ago +1 / -0

Foolish conservative... you knew I was a snake all along.

9
cjcivicx 9 points ago +9 / -0

I got downvoted to Hell when I opposed her appointment.

Now people are starting to see that she was a chosen replacement for RBG because she has a vag...

7
deleted 7 points ago +10 / -3
7
clintonsserver 7 points ago +8 / -1

You're literally a retard if you didn't see this coming based on her life.

7
UrTVisLying2U 7 points ago +7 / -0

She swears allegiance to one of the most corrupt entities on the planet. Many of us tried to send up flares but the message was not well received here.

1
DrNilesCrane___ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember when Trump got into a fight with the Pope back in summer 2016? That was great

5
Mraboman3 5 points ago +5 / -0

Jesse lee pederson warned us, woman are almost certainly to fold under pressure. Sure men do too but what 50% of the men stood their ground? I’d take a 50% failure rate over 100%. Just wait until heels up is in power

4
Jaybone86 4 points ago +4 / -0

Plenty of us said she was a bad pick and a lot more slobbered all over her.

2
BotFlyPenis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea, simps gonna simp. I only simp over Melania. AcB is a fraud. Never trusted her. She has those weird feminazi libtard crazy eyes.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
NamelessKing 4 points ago +4 / -0

robERT BARNES TRIED TO WARN US. HE DID NOT LIKE THAT PICK!

IT SHOULDVE BEEN THAT CUBAN CHICK FROM FLORIDA

REEEEEEEEEEEE FUCK YOU MITCH MCCONNELL FOR VETTING HER YOU MOTHERFUCKER!

3
GetUpStandUp 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didn't believe. LOL. The left put up no fight over her.

3
GarudaDarkblack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lots of theories going around talking about where ACB's loyalties are. I don't have the answers and I never held a strong opinion during her nomination, but I will say this. A woman with children is easy to threaten and control.

3
radome 3 points ago +5 / -2

The first clue was having two X chromosomes.

3
Dogpile1 3 points ago +3 / -0

She’s everything McConnell said she’d be. How is anyone surprised by this!

3
ItsBigLeagueNotBigly 3 points ago +7 / -4

Never put a woman in a position of power.

2
FuckGovernment 2 points ago +4 / -2

Kristi Noem?

3
Nfn8wzdm 3 points ago +3 / -0

FACT

2
DignityDude 2 points ago +2 / -0

She’s Catholic. She’s doing what any “Catholic conservative” would do.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BloodDe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Y’all think Mitch picked these justices?

2
Triclopse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wanted the Cuban Florida lady

2
Truelies 2 points ago +3 / -1

She is traitor bitch whore....

2
horus_falke 2 points ago +2 / -0

You guys never listen. You were warned, and you downvoted every comment calling her out for what she is.

We will never win until you all realize that nobody in politics or the media are on our side, at all.

2
Not_your_King 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well she's afraid of the libs, she's not afraid of you because you/we won't do anything about it. Libs will harass her threaten her life, go to her home and stay outside of it blasting lights into it.

You/we won't do anything, about it.

1
LeeeroyJennnkins 1 point ago +1 / -0

I never believed in her. Not even for a second. Same with Kavanaugh

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
UnmaskedPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we're underestimating the "threats to judges' families" factor.

1
zaku 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can somebody tell me what has happened with ACB? I'm out of the loop.

1
Hambonemcgee 1 point ago +1 / -0

She fits right in.

1
hillaryforprison 1 point ago +1 / -0

What did I miss- how is she and Kavanaugh bad?

1
Fusilli_jerry2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I knew it when the media praised and sensationalized her not needing to take notes.

1
2016TrumpMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

"We?" Speak for your fucking self. She didn't fool me for a second.

1
infojunkie07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Im glad Roberts, Kavaugh were all pro Trump - Oh Wait.... just make threads on ACB.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DicksOutForPepe16 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hindsight is 20/20. The bitch seemed based. She's fucking Roberts 2.0. We are so fucked.

Imagine feeling the need to pack the court when the court already does everything you want.

1
Trumpdidit 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have to realize, even the people we think share our values, has skeletons that they don't want people to see, or find out about. The only reason she pissed on our founding fathers grave's is because someone knows things, she doesn't want others to know about.

1
zerocooltx 1 point ago +1 / -0

I honestly don't trust anyone that adops kids from a foreign country. That's just a bizarre thing to do. I assume they lean left b/c they are trotting around virtue signal trophies instead of adopting kids that look like them, you know, so the kids don't have to CONSTANTLY explain to everyone why they are different than their parents. Like i'm sure you have to explain that 10 million times in your life if you are adopted by people from a different race.

1
DrNilesCrane___ 1 point ago +1 / -0

How come everyone on the Supreme Court is either a catholic or a jew?

Anyone?

1
Scuffers 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are all chicken-shits, hiding behind process etc to justify their cowardice

1
Wininit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did GEOTUS outsource her vetting or something? I thought she was legit simply based on how freaked out the leftists in my neck of the woods were reacting to her nomination.

1
neverreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

some of us tried to blow the whistle on this, but what can you do? you hope for the best. DJT was fooled on both weakling Kavanaugh and Barrett. Now we're fucked.

1
FuckGovernment 1 point ago +1 / -0

Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch = Catholics

Catholics = Fake Christians, Paganism, The Fraud Communist Pope, Globalists

1
RenaissanceOfHope 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gorsuch is pretty based.

1
RockapulcoRedpill 1 point ago +1 / -0

i knw her confirmation was wayyyy too easy at the time.

1
TheMAGAlorian787 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, if anyone thinks SCOTUS is going to protect our Second Amendment rights or our borders, I have nice beach front property in Montana I would like to sell you.

1
GarudaDarkblack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her rulings are conservative and constitutional originalist, but only if she bothers to hear the case and give a ruling at all. Greasy slimeball.

1
JohnParker1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Deep state plant, it looks like to me.