2516 () posted 52 days ago by Frosty468 52 days ago by Frosty468 +2516 / -0 104 comments share 104 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (104) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ -7 ▼ – buckfoomers -7 points 51 days ago +1 / -8 Banks are independently deciding associating with this company would be bad for their business. Prove they're colluding as one entity. permalink save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – deleted 5 points 51 days ago +6 / -1 ▲ 1 ▼ – buckfoomers 1 point 51 days ago +1 / -0 They're independent companies. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Trumpy_Bear 1 point 51 days ago +1 / -0 Yeah.. and so are all the institutions that collude with the uniparty, like SCOTUS permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – flashersenpai 1 point 51 days ago +1 / -0 banks are no more independent than utility companies which also benefit from extensive monopoly protections, codified in law and/or by regulation the state has made them untouchable via their growth and liability shields permalink parent save report block reply
Banks are independently deciding associating with this company would be bad for their business. Prove they're colluding as one entity.
They're independent companies.
Yeah.. and so are all the institutions that collude with the uniparty, like SCOTUS
banks are no more independent than utility companies which also benefit from extensive monopoly protections, codified in law and/or by regulation
the state has made them untouchable via their growth and liability shields