Last century when I joined Oathkeepers we were vetted, you signed up then were scrutinized before being accepted. No way a trans was accepted, it's lying about being an Oathkeeper or it lied to get in.
I don't know why it would be kept and messed with, that doesn't sound correct but regardless, everyone who breached the Capitol did trespass, probably did 'riot' in the sense they refused LE/security efforts to contain a perimeter.
Traitor joe the Pedo is on camera with Letterman years ago bragging about how when he was 21 he broke into the Capitol and broke into the Chairman's office and sat there. Hmmm, I hereby volunteer to arrest the sorry treasonous fook and if y'all want him stripped and humiliated we can manage it.
That is interesting what you said about the Oathkeepers. Perhaps it's something to be investigated if there even any proof that she is a member (which I don't believe). I feel if I was in your shoes I would probably contact the author of this article and perhaps bring up the inaccuracies of what is written here. I personally don't like the article, especially for a Gateway Pundit article. It completely victimizes this thing and stinks like BLM-type propaganda.
It's possible it cut it's tallywhacker off after joining. As I recall, when I signed up the gatekeepers verified my Service and submitted data, you agree to let them do that, or did then. You had to have an Honorable Discharge or other verifiable data which supported your claim to being Military or LE, or otherwise an Oath taker, Oath Keeper.
They ran my Service record and then accepted me a few weeks later.
But I guess as far as I really know maybe they don't look to see if a person is queer or mentally disturbed, like a trans-thingy.
Ok, I just went and checked, they have changed, of course. Now anyone can join...all they seem to require now is that you pay your dues, bummer.
Last century when I joined Oathkeepers we were vetted, you signed up then were scrutinized before being accepted. No way a trans was accepted, it's lying about being an Oathkeeper or it lied to get in.
I don't know why it would be kept and messed with, that doesn't sound correct but regardless, everyone who breached the Capitol did trespass, probably did 'riot' in the sense they refused LE/security efforts to contain a perimeter.
Traitor joe the Pedo is on camera with Letterman years ago bragging about how when he was 21 he broke into the Capitol and broke into the Chairman's office and sat there. Hmmm, I hereby volunteer to arrest the sorry treasonous fook and if y'all want him stripped and humiliated we can manage it.
Jes sayin.
https://files.catbox.moe/49s2ru.jpeg
That is interesting what you said about the Oathkeepers. Perhaps it's something to be investigated if there even any proof that she is a member (which I don't believe). I feel if I was in your shoes I would probably contact the author of this article and perhaps bring up the inaccuracies of what is written here. I personally don't like the article, especially for a Gateway Pundit article. It completely victimizes this thing and stinks like BLM-type propaganda.
It's possible it cut it's tallywhacker off after joining. As I recall, when I signed up the gatekeepers verified my Service and submitted data, you agree to let them do that, or did then. You had to have an Honorable Discharge or other verifiable data which supported your claim to being Military or LE, or otherwise an Oath taker, Oath Keeper.
They ran my Service record and then accepted me a few weeks later.
But I guess as far as I really know maybe they don't look to see if a person is queer or mentally disturbed, like a trans-thingy.
Ok, I just went and checked, they have changed, of course. Now anyone can join...all they seem to require now is that you pay your dues, bummer.
https://files.catbox.moe/d00lrj.jpg