882
Comments (22)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
party12 9 points ago +9 / -0

That is an insane response. He should not be considered because he obviously lack objectivity.

It is important that Republicans start asking these proposed justices whether they are capable of being objective. Are they not there to interpret the law and the constitution?

They are not on the Supreme Court to be social warriors (activists).

3
GBA4ever 3 points ago +3 / -0

And you think they will give honest answers?