That is an insane response. He should not be considered because he obviously lack objectivity.
It is important that Republicans start asking these proposed justices whether they are capable of being objective. Are they not there to interpret the law and the constitution?
They are not on the Supreme Court to be social warriors (activists).
That is an insane response. He should not be considered because he obviously lack objectivity.
It is important that Republicans start asking these proposed justices whether they are capable of being objective. Are they not there to interpret the law and the constitution?
They are not on the Supreme Court to be social warriors (activists).
And you think they will give honest answers?