Nothing was going to happen if we lost. The evidence is in nothing happening after we lost.
Look at the numbers. Purdue could have easily won his race even with the cheating. He lost more turnout than his opponent did. Had he lost them at the same rate, he would have won.
There was no victory in losing and weakness is not strength.
I don't disagree but also understand that the way the cheating occurs at least with the digital machine was to swap or weight the votes so actual turnout would have only increased opposition votes
That's a Dem psyop. That's why Wood was pushing it. His job was to demoralize so that the Democrats could win. Votes that were changed were changed by adjudication and that was far less than the mail-in fraud. More votes made it more difficult for the ones changing them to adjudicate them all.
Nothing was going to happen if we lost. The evidence is in nothing happening after we lost.
Look at the numbers. Purdue could have easily won his race even with the cheating. He lost more turnout than his opponent did. Had he lost them at the same rate, he would have won.
There was no victory in losing and weakness is not strength.
I don't disagree but also understand that the way the cheating occurs at least with the digital machine was to swap or weight the votes so actual turnout would have only increased opposition votes
That's a Dem psyop. That's why Wood was pushing it. His job was to demoralize so that the Democrats could win. Votes that were changed were changed by adjudication and that was far less than the mail-in fraud. More votes made it more difficult for the ones changing them to adjudicate them all.
Maybe. It doesn't help that any of the candidates were the most MAGA forward either.
Honestly I think our problems run a lot further than dems vs reps anyways.