3777
Comments (178)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
82
RichardSaunders 82 points ago +105 / -23

This falls at the feet of Trump, 2/3 of the judges he appointed are no better than Roberts 99% of the time.

91
deleted 91 points ago +101 / -10
32
deleted 32 points ago +35 / -3
16
Lord_Kek 16 points ago +16 / -0

Will Dominion allow it?

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
8
Aoikaze2000 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hopefully we can marshal the states that supported dominion to overthrow it. We've got to secure the states otherwise voting will be forever pointless.

13
nickybops 13 points ago +14 / -1

Is it me or is there more people than normal hating on Trump here on this site and blaming him for all of this? They are paid shills. I'm telling you now. Hating the one and ONLY man who actually took blows for us and you're throwing him (not you, but others) under the bus because you're flustered is fuckin retarded and you should just go to bunkerchan, start HRT and inevitably become part of the 41%.

9
AlohaSnackbar 9 points ago +9 / -0

It may be some paid shills, but I'd wager it's more just frustration and anger. Thats a hell of a combination that leads to a pain we just can't alleviate. And pain always leads to lashing out.

It's a fucked up world, and I'm not sure we can fuck it back right.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
2
Skyrison 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL what payback . our country is getting fucked hard dude.

14
zekin 14 points ago +14 / -0

I think the fault falls somewhat with trump as he picked them. But there's lots of traitors hiding in the midst and more likely here he appointed cowards. Im sure he has regret but it is what it is and trump has more than proven he cares about the American people. If only we could have cloned the man and had him appoint himself 3 times. Lmao

6
Donald4thewin 6 points ago +7 / -1

Trump was betrayed by so many. He was also under attack from the inside. There is only so much 1 person can do and he sparked a movement that has not weakened. In fact this betrayal will redpill more people.

4
Skyrison 4 points ago +4 / -0

trump's weakness is reading people.....and picking very bad people tbh :/ i saw it over the years.

1
The_MAGA_Patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes... Trump said all most of the right things, tried to do most of the right things, but was completely subverted by the worthless fucks that call themselves "conservatives" and conserve nothing...

We need to fight like Marxists if we ever expect to win

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
0
Redpillgirlfrommars 0 points ago +1 / -1

To be frank, you have no idea what was said. Just because trump’s every move isn’t personally tracked and broadcasted to you doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. Jesus.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
43
BigFreedomBoner 43 points ago +46 / -3

Trump loves brand names. Too much. Fucking Ivy Leagues just suck.

But I disagree, these fuckers are traitors.

24
deleted 24 points ago +25 / -1
12
fskfsk 12 points ago +13 / -1

Part of the problem is that Trump really didn't have good lawyers for his election fraud lawsuits. They were arguing procedural technicalities instead of "WTF! Fraud!"

It didn't help that lots of his lawyers were doxxed and pressured to resign. "You represent Trump and we'll ruin your career and burn down your home!" Then the lawyers folded.

8
cryogen 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sorry to say but I don't think this is the right take. The "technicality" route was the only one that had any chance of being heard and acted on within the available time. Just as Thomas opines here, complex cases with intricate evidence and discovery etc. just can't be resolved in a short time period, which made pushing fraud claims a losing strategy before Jan 6th.

NOW, we can. But it's gonna require actual audits and uncovering of the fraud ASAP. Our focus needs to be on making the fraud obvious. SCOTUS can decline to hear this sort of "moot" case, but if there's widespread acknowledgement of significant fraud something will happen; either courts or guns will press the issue at that point.

4
fskfsk 4 points ago +4 / -0

A lot of the evidence has been destroyed already. Hard drives wiped, firmware upgraded, ballots and envelopes shredded. Arizona's legislature couldn't even do an audit, because some Republicans cucked and voted against enforcing a subpoena.

3
Tallsie 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was the left’s plan though, they are doing the same thing now.

2
AnonymousFrog 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s part of the problem with the Navarro Report. It starts with a bunch of “boo hoo they didn’t change the rules constitutionally,” which is a reasonable thing to complain about in court, but no where near as powerful as pointing out the statistical aberrations and affidavits from people who saw them sneaking in unfolded “main-in ballots.” The latter is what puts pressure on the system from people who aren’t bored by your narrative, but outraged at the theft of the election.

3
Redpillgirlfrommars 3 points ago +3 / -0

Uhhh changing the rules unconstitutionally should be powerful. It’s fucking unconstitutional. It should have been a slam dunk case.

1
Redpillgirlfrommars 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because you have to prove intent with fraud. That is far more difficult to prove/win.

Arguing elections were unconstitutional, because they literally were, should have been an instant win.

However, when the government is corrupt from the top down, no argument would have worked.

0
Skyrison 0 points ago +2 / -2

trump being silent on this sure does NOT play to his strengths...it makes a lot of people think that he was in on it this whole time...

2
Redpillgirlfrommars 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh I’m sorry do you want him to tweet about it?

He doesn’t have the same means of reaching his supporters as he used to. Give it a fucking full 24 hrs first, my god.

16
AlcoholicRetard 16 points ago +18 / -2

Who could he have picked that the senate would confirm?

5
Waffleyumboy 5 points ago +7 / -2

He's talking out of his ass.

12
Onemoretime11 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yup, the communist bench is broad and deep

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
7
CJBarnacle 7 points ago +7 / -0

No need. They already have 6-7 liberal justices.

2
NoFucks2Give 2 points ago +2 / -0

The SC is defending deep state control of US politics.