1207
Comments (295)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
brinecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

so if i pull out my penis a magical vagina lady is supposed to just show up so i may impregnate her ?? then what, have a kid everytime i would have beat off? when i am up to 8 kids i can’t afford get on public assistance and bleed tax payers’ money??? wouldn’t that be anti-conservative?

this is more of a fantasy than the porn most men watch. i swear this is fucking retarded.

1
Kamalas_a_Bitch [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are applying liberal literal logic to the situation, which causes retardation.

2
brinecat 2 points ago +2 / -0

im being hyperbolic to show how retarded this lineage of thinking is...

the point of my statement is porn is a fantasy, an entertaining escape for men.

if you were to substitute that with reproduction - every single time, (she is not making a clear distinction here...) you would end up with more children than you could care for.

2
Kamalas_a_Bitch [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I can see that and am reading more into it than what the tweet says. I take it as 1.) conservatives need to make lots of babies; 2.) birth control is fine but don’t jack off too porn to substitute fucking your wife/gf, because that will end up destroying the relationship and possibly family too. 3.) Fantasize all you want, but don’t use porn cuz it lessens your spiritual life/increases narcissism.

1
brinecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

at the foundation its still a ‘moralist’ argument.

i would file this under ‘advice’ and not apply to everyone through modification of law... we should very rarely make calls to ‘ ban ‘ things.