238 They allowed Clarence Thomas to dissent but only if he said that Biden would’ve won anyway. Fuck him too (media.patriots.win) posted 52 days ago by leakmouth 52 days ago by leakmouth +239 / -1 35 comments share 35 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (35) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 8 ▼ – SuperDuperHypersonic 8 points 52 days ago +8 / -0 They can't really make that judgement without looking at the evidence though, so it shows their not an impartial judge already. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – Elvathelion 4 points 52 days ago +4 / -0 It's (the cases presented) specifically about Pennsylvania and it's true that PA alone would not by itself change the results of the election. Thomas is correct. The law is about specifics - that's how you make arguments. permalink parent save report block reply
They can't really make that judgement without looking at the evidence though, so it shows their not an impartial judge already.
It's (the cases presented) specifically about Pennsylvania and it's true that PA alone would not by itself change the results of the election. Thomas is correct.
The law is about specifics - that's how you make arguments.