The sentence "the concept of mathematics being purely objective is unequivocally false" is itself unequivocally false. Also, using a six-syllable word in your equity guidelines is super white supremacist.
That is the issue with post-modernist critical theories, they object that there is any actual truth that can be formed in the basis of reality, only personal preference. To them nothing is objective and they reject objectivity entirely.
2+2=4,
uhm actually a truncated 2.5 + a truncated 2.5 = 5.
Yeah, but 2+2=4
No, 2+2=5
It is pure logical if I count two apples then I grab two more and I count them, there’re four.
But if we cut the apples in half and count them, there’re 8 apple slices. So 2+2=8
But didn’t you just state the 2+2=5
Yeah, 5=8, they are just symbols on a piece of paper.
But the abstract implications of 5=8 is insane. If we subtract 5 from both sides, 0=3 and therefore any number n will equal itself plus or minus 3m, where m is a number.
Yeah, that makes perfectly logical sense.
So 1 apple is now 4, 7, 10, -2, 1+3i, etc apples. It fails the identity property.
An apple can identify as whatever it wishes.
But that isn’t conducive to reality.
Shut up bigot, 2+2=5 and apples can be whatever they want.
The sentence "the concept of mathematics being purely objective is unequivocally false" is itself unequivocally false. Also, using a six-syllable word in your equity guidelines is super white supremacist.
That is the issue with post-modernist critical theories, they object that there is any actual truth that can be formed in the basis of reality, only personal preference. To them nothing is objective and they reject objectivity entirely.
2+2=4,
uhm actually a truncated 2.5 + a truncated 2.5 = 5.
Yeah, but 2+2=4
No, 2+2=5
It is pure logical if I count two apples then I grab two more and I count them, there’re four.
But if we cut the apples in half and count them, there’re 8 apple slices. So 2+2=8
But didn’t you just state the 2+2=5
Yeah, 5=8, they are just symbols on a piece of paper.
But the abstract implications of 5=8 is insane. If we subtract 5 from both sides, 0=3 and therefore any number n will equal itself plus or minus 3m, where m is a number.
Yeah, that makes perfectly logical sense.
So 1 apple is now 4, 7, 10, -2, 1+3i, etc apples. It fails the identity property.
An apple can identify as whatever it wishes.
But that isn’t conducive to reality.
Shut up bigot, 2+2=5 and apples can be whatever they want.
Some dumbass actually used the Wendy's 2 for $5 menu as proof that 2+2 can equal 5 🙄
That sentence is the equivalent of "Only a Sith deals in absolutes".
I will do what I must.
Six-syllables, give or take a few syllables. In ebonics I pronunce it with three syllables.