Problems that have complex, competing, or multiple answers have those answers because there is a way to determine right answers for problems with multiple solutions.
"Unpacking the assumptions" = "Determining the predicates of the system" = "Learning how to give right answers"
"analyze [data] in multiple ways to draw different conclusions" is not about finding a mathematical solution.
The thinking behind this is fundamentally important to understand, and underlies much. "Objectivity" is impossible and/or bad, yet you must accept that proposition as the only objective truth.
Problems that have complex, competing, or multiple answers have those answers because there is a way to determine right answers for problems with multiple solutions.
"Unpacking the assumptions" = "Determining the predicates of the system" = "Learning how to give right answers"
"analyze [data] in multiple ways to draw different conclusions" is not about finding a mathematical solution.
The thinking behind this is fundamentally important to understand, and underlies much. "Objectivity" is impossible and/or bad, yet you must accept that proposition as the only objective truth.
People who don't learn to think critically are more inclined to believe BS like the Green New Deal.