I would disagree, but I would ask, are all the other women in politics worth that exception? We're talking about populations, not individuals. The difference between men and women is great enough that it's better to bar all women even if you exclude a handful of good ones, and it's better to include all men even if you end up with a handful of bad ones.
No, I am a conservative, you are not the arbiter of what conservatism is. The founding fathers also didn't want women voting, were they not conservatives? Libertarianism has, and will, never work because people are not equal, even if there are exceptional individuals.
What's funny is you're ignoring hundreds of years of conservatives self identifying as such, and you think your pissant opinion on whether they were "real" conservatives means anything. "No true Scotsman" and all that, though I'm sure understanding that logical fallacy will be simple for an intellectual heavy weight like you lol.
I would disagree, but I would ask, are all the other women in politics worth that exception? We're talking about populations, not individuals. The difference between men and women is great enough that it's better to bar all women even if you exclude a handful of good ones, and it's better to include all men even if you end up with a handful of bad ones.
take your male dems, I'll take my lady conservatives
No, I am a conservative, you are not the arbiter of what conservatism is. The founding fathers also didn't want women voting, were they not conservatives? Libertarianism has, and will, never work because people are not equal, even if there are exceptional individuals.
What's funny is you're ignoring hundreds of years of conservatives self identifying as such, and you think your pissant opinion on whether they were "real" conservatives means anything. "No true Scotsman" and all that, though I'm sure understanding that logical fallacy will be simple for an intellectual heavy weight like you lol.