2101
Comments (89)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
97
vote_for_MAGA_2020 97 points ago +102 / -5

Me pre-confirmation: hey everyone, i'm pretty sure she's a closet liberal. she "cried" with her black daughter when george floyd died, she's emasculated her husband numerous times, she talks a lot about female empowerment....

Majority of TDW: shut up you shill! shut up you liberal! she's the best pick! boy she sure is HOT!!!! also, she's going to get rid of Roe v Wade!!!

Me: uh, there's no way SCOTUS is going to overturn Roe v Wade just like that....

Majority of TDW: shut up you shill! downvote! deport! she sure does have nice rack!

Me today: >.<

47
FreeKyle2020 47 points ago +47 / -0

Fuckin A. We shoulda listened. I thought she would be a good one. Trump should have picked the Cuban.

39
Pepesforfreedom 39 points ago +40 / -1

She probably wouldn’t have been any better. These people were pre picked by Mitch and cronies, likely to even be considered youve had to do some shady things to get the “right” people to trust you. Trump couldn’t have passed someone who he picked and vetted himself.

-8
Leatherwood -8 points ago +2 / -10

NOT DISAGREEING WITH YOU, BUT MY ONLY COMMENT IS THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP MAY HAVE PICKED HER TO EXPOSE HER. DEPENDING ON WHAT ACB IS INVOLVED IN, HER DAYS ON THE COURT MAY BE NUMBERED.

8
MegoThor 8 points ago +8 / -0

She’s probably only got forty or fifty years left.

24
PurestEvil 24 points ago +24 / -0

The lesson here is: Do not pick women into office unless you are absolutely sure they are based. MTG is a good example. Candace Owens too. Ayn Rand.

As of men, do a testosterone test. If it's too low - clear reject. Then look for evidence of basedness in their views and knowledge.

16
phandaal 16 points ago +16 / -0

Ayn Rand is being proven more and more correct every day.

5
VulgarProphet 5 points ago +5 / -0

yup. i used to hate her.

4
Equality72521 4 points ago +4 / -0

We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.

  • Ayn Rand
0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +2 / -2

What guarantee is there that Candace Owens is based and not controlled opposition? She was actively anti-Trump in 2015 as far as I know, and only began supporting him in 2017. And her career has involved marketing agencies. And she is working deeply with PragerU. PragerU which among other parts seem to promote controlled opposition people like Ben Shapiro, and which as far as I know seem to promote policies enabling lots and lots and lots of immigration, as long as that immigration has been made legal.

6
vote_for_MAGA_2020 6 points ago +7 / -1

There was nothing we could have done. Trump made his decision. We could have protested, but too many of us liked the pick.

3
Arwyn3x 3 points ago +4 / -1

Amy Coney Barrett should have refused the appointment. She knew she wasn't what President Trump as all of us thought she was, and she knew that the left didn't want her anywhere near the SC. so an ethical person would have turned it down,

Instead she misled us and the President, probably colluded with Mitch McConnell to take us all for a ride.

If she had been honest, we wouldn't have supported her - the left hated her - so who did supported her, besides China Mitch?

She was/is a cheap trick, a penny waiting for change.

13
snakeoil 13 points ago +13 / -0

I never trust women as a general rule

10
Nimble_Nana 10 points ago +10 / -0

I don't trust them and I don't like them very much. And I am one.

9
DeepWinter 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yup, you called it. Rest of us jumped on that hype train snorting hopium and look where it got us.

Speaking for myself, I'll hope I never fall for this again. Even people like DeSantis and Noem I expect to let us down eventually. They have to prove to me every day they are patriots or they can GTFO!

6
vote_for_MAGA_2020 6 points ago +8 / -2

I fully expect Boebert and MTG to fuck us over later as well.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
3
rocco_saint 3 points ago +3 / -0

So. You ever hear on TV and Movies with the CIA talking about "assets" in reference to people? Apply that here, in this case. If a person is in any way associated with politics, be it an actual politician themselves, government employee (including judges), etc. Then you need to look at them as assets. They are to be used to meet your own personal objectives and beliefs and then cast them aside as their value diminishes. When the CIA does it, they'll off the asset. But that's definitely no what I'm referring to. Instead I'm suggesting that you cut that politician off from your support in all aspects and go on the offense to drive them out of office using socio/political means to do so.

In short, don't get personally invested in any politician. No matter how good they sound right now. They're not worth your emotional attachment. Cast them aside the first time they counter your beliefs. And yeah by following this rule you'll shit on some good people. But at this point the math works out far more in favor that you'll be shitting on a snake.

6
TheSuperStableGenius 6 points ago +7 / -1

This, I said she was a female roberts and the mouth breathers got mad

3
HockeyMom4Trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

I feel you, Fren. I was not a huge fan of her either.