We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.
What guarantee is there that Candace Owens is based and not controlled opposition? She was actively anti-Trump in 2015 as far as I know, and only began supporting him in 2017. And her career has involved marketing agencies. And she is working deeply with PragerU. PragerU which among other parts seem to promote controlled opposition people like Ben Shapiro, and which as far as I know seem to promote policies enabling lots and lots and lots of immigration, as long as that immigration has been made legal.
The lesson here is: Do not pick women into office unless you are absolutely sure they are based. MTG is a good example. Candace Owens too. Ayn Rand.
As of men, do a testosterone test. If it's too low - clear reject. Then look for evidence of basedness in their views and knowledge.
Ayn Rand is being proven more and more correct every day.
yup. i used to hate her.
We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.
What guarantee is there that Candace Owens is based and not controlled opposition? She was actively anti-Trump in 2015 as far as I know, and only began supporting him in 2017. And her career has involved marketing agencies. And she is working deeply with PragerU. PragerU which among other parts seem to promote controlled opposition people like Ben Shapiro, and which as far as I know seem to promote policies enabling lots and lots and lots of immigration, as long as that immigration has been made legal.