35
Comments (12)
sorted by:
3
AJRJR 3 points ago +3 / -0

We've already moved the line back time and time again for months now. Dare them? Or what? We've had the fight socially conditioned right out of us. The vast majority of us anyway. We won't do shit.

4
befehlistbefehl 4 points ago +4 / -0

We won't do shit.

What's worse is how viciously we disown anyone on our side who does.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
AJRJR 3 points ago +3 / -0

Make it count - Go out fighting, and take a few of them with you.

1
befehlistbefehl 1 point ago +2 / -1

Also, when someone enforces the boundaries they set, we don't support them, but instead condemn them saying "I'm not on the side of a deranged gunman. He was probably just one of those incel mass shooters."

0
Lordahdaring 0 points ago +1 / -1

There's a very wide gulf between honoring protected rights and siding with the victims of our CIA and Big Pharma problems.

1
Lordahdaring 1 point ago +1 / -0

Partly, that is what the judiciary is for, but when all of those cunts have decided, just like every other branch of government to just screw the citizens and suck the cock of the powerful, we get this.

1
NotMyGovernor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't it Trump that said we're not going to fucking tell you what we're going to do?

2
BlackKat 2 points ago +2 / -0

tick tok

1
Cpl_McMerica_1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also dude, Chinamen is not the preferred nomenclature.

1
JustTheNews [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

what about china men

2
Cpl_McMerica_1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cross this line you do not

It's a line from big lebowski about drawing a line in the sand