1324
Comments (61)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-7
SynisterBaconLord -7 points ago +3 / -10

1955

suspiciously high res

I'm gonna have to press X for doubt on this one, chief.

5
47urOFH3d 5 points ago +6 / -1

What we are looking at above is the digitized version of an analog photograph. Why would it have low resolution?

-3
SynisterBaconLord -3 points ago +2 / -5

To prove that it wasn't altered from the original? Sorry but I still remember evangelists trying to pass off bird fetus pictures for human fetuses to make their point. Once bitten, twice shy.

Who's to say this was little more than a blue that they added more distinguishing features? It's not just the media and government that will try to manipulate you.