253
Comments (33)
sorted by:
37
women_for_trump 37 points ago +37 / -0

So does this mean when you are interviewing people you have to ask them which team they bat for? Because I thought that was illegal.

But now employers are supposed to promote you based on who you have sex with? What could go wrong.

9
vote_for_MAGA_2020 9 points ago +10 / -1

Honestly, this bill is virtue signaling nonsense. Most companies have minorities on their boards anyway.

8
caKAG 8 points ago +8 / -0

And if they don't, they can get a straight white male to identify as a POC or LGBTQ person, and the state cannot question it, otherwise it would be (fill in the blank)phobic.

5
YouNeedVPN 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yup. Tons of virtue signaling companies with diversity promotions already exist in CA.

18
Witchstone 18 points ago +18 / -0

Well, I look forward to the further exodus of businesses from California. The more insanity they impose on companies, the more they will leave, the faster that turd circles the drain.

4
Libertas_Vel_Mors 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup.

The only downside is that most of these businesses will set up shop in Austin, TX, as well as other festering outposts of libtard shitholery in otherwise red areas.

Take a lesson from those of us in Oregon - kick those fuckers out as fast as they arrive, or you'll end up like us.

2
Doggfaceponysoldier 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cheap Oceanside real estate

10
henri_derelicte 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is overkill. The government has no right to tell corporations who they should or should not appoint as their board of directors

7
Brellin 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's especially ironic because the rallying cry of the leftist that supports censorship is "private companies can do what they want" but then they say nothing when the government tries to force private companies to hire people based on sexist and racist policy. Which these literally are, because they're trying to force these companies to hire people based on their sexuality and their race.

2
henri_derelicte 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re absolutely right. The left is all for empowering private companies when it’s convenient for them, whether it’s big tech censorship or requiring masks in states that don’t require it.

6
Gmelindag 6 points ago +6 / -0

Insanity loves company.

5
Mary0624 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’d pay the fine. Fuck them and the tranny men who want to use the women’s aka children’s bathroom.

14
Tyscribz 14 points ago +14 / -0

or you know, move your company to a more free state

6
usdodsgssog 6 points ago +6 / -0

In a banana republic all fines are paid in bananas 🙃

3
Brellin 3 points ago +3 / -0

better idea, don't pay the fine and also ignore the practices, and if they try to do anything take them to the courts and grill them over a fire for trying to force you to violate peoples privacy laws which state you aren't allowed to ask employees about their sexual preferences.

3
YouNeedVPN 3 points ago +3 / -0

How about you pay me $50k and I'll claim to be transblack.

You save money and I get paid. Win win

5
Thep1mp 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mandatory homosexuality. “And if one of you ain’t queer, one of you will be by the end of this board meeting. Whose going gay?!?!?!?”

4
c89631147e 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds like a violation of the Civil Rights Act.

Instead of bitching on the internet, get to work!

2
Minn2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke (1978) is the precedent. Lawyer up!

3
FUSnowflake 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let them start promoting Pentecostal Christians. Don't see too many of them in the C-suite of Fortune 500 companies, do you?

3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

Learn the lesson of the last three decades. Stop giving inches.

2
Gwoz8881 2 points ago +2 / -0

Diversity quotas are the worst thing ever though of

2
BasedNtruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Falls right in line with chasing more companies out of CA.

Some still think we’re being hyperbolic when we say they WANT a full on collapse to usher in a socialist state.

2
Warcraft1966 2 points ago +2 / -0

faggots in control

2
Prime67 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've always wondered...what's to stop me from just saying I am bisexual? Like I am in a happily married monogamous relationship with my wife and would never cheat on her so sorry guys I can't go suck a dick to prove how bi I am but trust me...if I could....totally bi. Hire me or your a bigot.

1
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wanted: Minority or LBGTBBQWTF Director. Job duties include holding a sign infront of the corporate office with "They were forced to hire me for diversity at the director level.". No cold calls or other selling methods.

Requirements: No whites.
Reports: None.
Salary: Commission based.

Look, just saved them all 100k a year.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ztrich007 1 point ago +1 / -0

That, that was fast. Too fast

1
Rickshawrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think "Diversity through racism" has a good ring to it.

1
Trumpy_Bear 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's illegal by federal law. If the mist recent ruling made discrimination against LGBT illegal because of "but for..." ruling, that still applies here

1
dixond 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok ok ok so, hear me out here: what if I identify as gay despite never having homosexual sex, and being married to my loving wife and the father to my many children?

1
HighPedeEnergy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just get one of the dudes on the board to claim they suck dick on their free time. Who cares if they have a wife or not. Cali dumb dumbs won’t look into it.

0
POPOPO 0 points ago +1 / -1

fuk LGBT.....LGBT suk....fkn skummbags