1042
Comments (20)
sorted by:
12
War_Hamster 12 points ago +12 / -0

There is no legitimate reason for an honest voting machine to have:

A) The ability to access the internet.

B) The ability to count in anything other than integers.

That's all the proof we need.

9
GrandDaddyMemesGhost [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don't think machines need to be any part of the process; back to pen and paper and hand counting. Machines are supposed to make our lives easier, but we've traded security for comfort on this one.

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

You'll get absolutely no argument from me.

7
G_regulator 7 points ago +7 / -0

Most modern democracy's have paper ballots and always will.

6
MudDog 6 points ago +6 / -0

libs: so what, you trust computers to keep track of your health and financial information, keep your private information secure, and to secure your private communications

me: I don't trust the computers doing ANY of those things!

5
doodaddy 5 points ago +5 / -0

You can cheat egregiously with paper. The mail-ins were paper. The adjudications were really paper. Machines are just leverage to do things faster. You could create a machine that is encrypted, verifiable, etc. You could do the entire process online securely. But we know they won't. We also know they won't do paper correctly. To limit the amount of cheating, we'd all have to stand in a big 120M person group and raise hands and count. They'd cheat at that too, though.

The problem is not the paper or the machines. The problem is the tyrants.

3
PrezElectHamsandwich 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've worked in the tech industry. The security practices in 99% of companies out there are appalling. Unless there's money involved, then they're just shoddy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
GrandDaddyMemesGhost [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some things don't need to be digital; MAKE ANALOG GREAT AGAIN!

2
PM_Me_Ur_Weird_Bendy 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no reason to even have digital machines, it can be done analog and impossible to hack remotely... Its just dots on paper why do you need software at all?

2
Gmelindag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes they are! That’s why Venezuela and Cuba never lose their elections!

1
Rucktoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

And as a kickback scheme for liberals.

1
Hoid_the_Bard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny how machines were fallible when Bernie lost the primary, but a few short months later we had the MOST SECURE ELECTION IN US HISTORY

1
tyuah8 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is at least true for Dominion Voting Machines, as confirmed by the people who wrote the Antrim County forensic report.

1
snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember the Tweet by Elections Canada! They said we never use Dominion machines or any other machines... it was awesome. Lindell should bring that tweet for his court case!

1
Wrexxis780 1 point ago +1 / -0

No they weren’t, the People on TV said so.

Oh did you mean change your mind using facts? Yeah I can’t do that without saying lies.

1
DeplorableSpic3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Government hired, payroll professional election officials ONLY exist to cheat on elections

Do you really need a politician hired person devoted to ... counting?

1
WhiteTrashJesus 1 point ago +1 / -0

The ones that are used were

-2
AtariArtist -2 points ago +1 / -3

Hey PeePee the frog. You fucking moron, THEY HAD PAPER BALLOTS IN AZ.

ITS THE TABULATORS THAT COUNT THE PAPER BALLOTS THAT ARE THE PROBLEM.

JESUS FUCK no wonder we lost the election with this no-brain cringe frog shit.

1
GrandDaddyMemesGhost [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Geez, sorry you are so angry and dislike Pepe so much, fren.