LMAO -- Bankers aren't caving; they are driving the narrative for their own designs. Just whom do you think is paying the press to write those bad things in the first place?
OK, agree. But banking is certainly as much a "human right" as health care. Nobody would be okay with a doctor refusing to treat someone because they didn't like his politics. Banking is up there with medicine as a necessity.
And nobody is asking for free banking, as a human right, the way some want free health care.
Cancelling is getting very Nazi, and I do mean the German 1930s. Really. "Jewish Shop, don't patronize."
The American National Family Story, in our heads, of liberty and justice for all, is hurting. All means all. All.
It was disastrous to lose the media in January 2017. Getting it back should have been a vital project with its own staff. Because the media drives law. We have had no real law, as a respected and dreaded thing, for many years.
They have always been subject to law enforcement subpoena, and all. Law enforcement. Not just "the bad things the press has written." I never heard the press has force of law, or we are all in the high school bathroom gossiping enough to make the paint peel.
It is retail banking. This is like buying a stamp to mail a letter. Mechanical only. You can't have the post office say, "the press says bad things about you, no stamps for you. Carry your letter to your friend out of state yourself. Unless the planes won't fly you, you disgusting extremist. Buy your own plane or walk."
We can't have social non-personing of people who have done nothing illegal. We have law to decide what happens to people.
What's higher on the food chain that the Central Bankers?
What you're talking about with retail banks and others is how they "should" behave, but they long ago jumped the shark. The biggest companies in the world have chosen sides and have been debanking, defunding, deplatforming, and censoring those with opposing political views. It is against the law, but that hasn't stopped them yet.
The law is broken. What we are trying to do is fix it, but they've had a very big head start.
Face it, we now live in a two-tiered nation, and if you're on this website, you're on the oppressed side.
Shoulda-woulda is depressing but let me indulge in it briefly: it was disastrous to not establish a "capture-the-narrative office" in Jan 2017. In the Trump camp.
A team of PR geniuses should have been hired to recapture the press, and also to go around it, to reach the vast carpet of idiots who thought Trump stood for being mean to women and other living things.
This was not done.
I adore Melania, but her jacket that read, "I don't really care, do you?" was a mistake, and indicative of a larger mistake. The peanut gallery matters.
OK. Weep session over.
What to do now? Neighborhood Educator must become a real job. And there is still big, big money that likes Trump. They have to start funding things, such as a MAGA Legal Hotline, and other support. And the GOVERNORSHIPS have to be focused on. Who ever gave much thought to them? Well it turns out that's where the engine room is.
Trump might buy up a patch of Harlem USA, the spiritual capital of black America, and make it so great and fun and interesting that it couldn't be ignored.
I like the direction you're going. Think locally and grass roots. Get involved at the Precinct level and push MAGA issues from every angle. I did: https://1776foreverfree.com
Oh, and we are the PR geniuses that are countering the MSM narrative and we are winning.
The hidden reality is banks co-own all the major media outlets because they've provided the venture capital and ongoing financial support. They're not banning gab because of the articles they had written about gab, they're eliminating the competition.
Read "manufacturing consent" by noam chompsky. All media in the US is owned by banks, about 6 mega corps and 12 families.
I do not quarrel about the power of the purse, but hearing the name Noam Chomsky makes me need brain bleach.
I have seen the white faced terror in a banker's face as he discussed the Clinton-era Fair Housing Act or whatever it was called, designed to force banks, with the force of increased regulation and heavy fines, to give mortgages to poor people who did not meet normal loan qualifications. In plain English, who were possibly going to default.
I have never seen so much fear in an educated, senior level, man's face.
You have to realize that the people who have armed men at their disposal are the ones who give the orders. They can tax, and print money. And they can impose huge fines. Banking is a very heavily regulated business.
I think the banks were pressured to de-bank Gab, from above, and had to. You think it's the other way around. Whatever, that cannot stand.
I agree regardless of how you view it, it's deeply disturbing that anyone can be denied any service because of their political beliefs, sexual orientation, skin colour ect. ect.
No, this is new and worth making a fuss about. Any legal business should be able to do its banking. The porn magazine people, the guy who just died, he got criticism, but I never heard he had trouble banking. If he had been unable to bank, he would never have been able to do business.
Oh wait.
Damn this shit anyway.
This is why you need the Pledge of Allegiance daily in youth. "For All." All.
LMAO -- Bankers aren't caving; they are driving the narrative for their own designs. Just whom do you think is paying the press to write those bad things in the first place?
OK, agree. But banking is certainly as much a "human right" as health care. Nobody would be okay with a doctor refusing to treat someone because they didn't like his politics. Banking is up there with medicine as a necessity.
And nobody is asking for free banking, as a human right, the way some want free health care.
Cancelling is getting very Nazi, and I do mean the German 1930s. Really. "Jewish Shop, don't patronize."
The American National Family Story, in our heads, of liberty and justice for all, is hurting. All means all. All.
It was disastrous to lose the media in January 2017. Getting it back should have been a vital project with its own staff. Because the media drives law. We have had no real law, as a respected and dreaded thing, for many years.
Banks are not and have never been neutral.
They should be, but they are not.
They have always been subject to law enforcement subpoena, and all. Law enforcement. Not just "the bad things the press has written." I never heard the press has force of law, or we are all in the high school bathroom gossiping enough to make the paint peel.
Yes, I remember when all of the bankers went to jail for causing the Great Financial Crisis........oh, wait, never mind..... They got raises.
It is retail banking. This is like buying a stamp to mail a letter. Mechanical only. You can't have the post office say, "the press says bad things about you, no stamps for you. Carry your letter to your friend out of state yourself. Unless the planes won't fly you, you disgusting extremist. Buy your own plane or walk." We can't have social non-personing of people who have done nothing illegal. We have law to decide what happens to people.
What's higher on the food chain that the Central Bankers?
What you're talking about with retail banks and others is how they "should" behave, but they long ago jumped the shark. The biggest companies in the world have chosen sides and have been debanking, defunding, deplatforming, and censoring those with opposing political views. It is against the law, but that hasn't stopped them yet.
The law is broken. What we are trying to do is fix it, but they've had a very big head start.
Face it, we now live in a two-tiered nation, and if you're on this website, you're on the oppressed side.
Yup.
Shoulda-woulda is depressing but let me indulge in it briefly: it was disastrous to not establish a "capture-the-narrative office" in Jan 2017. In the Trump camp.
A team of PR geniuses should have been hired to recapture the press, and also to go around it, to reach the vast carpet of idiots who thought Trump stood for being mean to women and other living things.
This was not done.
I adore Melania, but her jacket that read, "I don't really care, do you?" was a mistake, and indicative of a larger mistake. The peanut gallery matters.
OK. Weep session over.
What to do now? Neighborhood Educator must become a real job. And there is still big, big money that likes Trump. They have to start funding things, such as a MAGA Legal Hotline, and other support. And the GOVERNORSHIPS have to be focused on. Who ever gave much thought to them? Well it turns out that's where the engine room is.
Trump might buy up a patch of Harlem USA, the spiritual capital of black America, and make it so great and fun and interesting that it couldn't be ignored.
I like the direction you're going. Think locally and grass roots. Get involved at the Precinct level and push MAGA issues from every angle. I did: https://1776foreverfree.com
Oh, and we are the PR geniuses that are countering the MSM narrative and we are winning.
This is why crypto is going to be a thing
They seem to be forcing it. What you need to do is question, why?
Far more bad things have been written about CNN, NYT, WaPo, et al.
Press can "write bad things" about whoever and whatever they want so we can't let THAT lead to a loss of liberty.
Who are these banks and why aren't we blowing up their phones and email?
We can fight. Here's an opportunity.
Who's with me?
It's not an original idea, but if we all just took our money out of the banks, we'd shutter the whole system overnight.
From what I could tell, they are carefully not mentioned. Unless I missed it?
You have a point. If they can do that so brazenly, it can be known who they are.
The hidden reality is banks co-own all the major media outlets because they've provided the venture capital and ongoing financial support. They're not banning gab because of the articles they had written about gab, they're eliminating the competition.
Read "manufacturing consent" by noam chompsky. All media in the US is owned by banks, about 6 mega corps and 12 families.
I do not quarrel about the power of the purse, but hearing the name Noam Chomsky makes me need brain bleach. I have seen the white faced terror in a banker's face as he discussed the Clinton-era Fair Housing Act or whatever it was called, designed to force banks, with the force of increased regulation and heavy fines, to give mortgages to poor people who did not meet normal loan qualifications. In plain English, who were possibly going to default. I have never seen so much fear in an educated, senior level, man's face. You have to realize that the people who have armed men at their disposal are the ones who give the orders. They can tax, and print money. And they can impose huge fines. Banking is a very heavily regulated business. I think the banks were pressured to de-bank Gab, from above, and had to. You think it's the other way around. Whatever, that cannot stand.
I agree regardless of how you view it, it's deeply disturbing that anyone can be denied any service because of their political beliefs, sexual orientation, skin colour ect. ect.
We are truly living in a dystopian society
You remind me of the gay wedding cake. Hmmm. "Public accomodation."
OK fire up the MAGA Lawyer Lions.
bankers are not neutral dude
No, this is new and worth making a fuss about. Any legal business should be able to do its banking. The porn magazine people, the guy who just died, he got criticism, but I never heard he had trouble banking. If he had been unable to bank, he would never have been able to do business. Oh wait. Damn this shit anyway. This is why you need the Pledge of Allegiance daily in youth. "For All." All.