There are many cases like this right now where it is clear that leadership was running the entire show until it fails, and then they try to skate off to their next destination without any accountability.
Ken, it's time to start asking the right questions.
Where were the auditors?
If they existed, did the auditors have any empowerment to protect against this situation, or were their hands tied by leadership / policy?
What procedures were in place to protect the organization from corrupt actions / bad leadership?
What is the extent of the damage that can be attributed to their policy decisions?
Is there any evidence of the board members making decisions that would fall outside of the interests of their official capacity and responsibilities? (e.g. heavily skewed decision matrices)
How will you assure that this cannot happen again?
There are many cases like this right now where it is clear that leadership was running the entire show until it fails, and then they try to skate off to their next destination without any accountability.
Ken, it's time to start asking the right questions.
Where were the auditors? If they existed, did the auditors have any empowerment to protect against this situation, or were their hands tied by leadership / policy? What procedures were in place to protect the organization from corrupt actions / bad leadership? What is the extent of the damage that can be attributed to their policy decisions? Is there any evidence of the board members making decisions that would fall outside of the interests of their official capacity and responsibilities? (e.g. heavily skewed decision matrices) How will you assure that this cannot happen again?