Mate ... the number of subscribers a channel like Fox has is controlled only by the decision they've made on how many subscribers to pay for.
Let's go with a less controversial channel on youtube ... the Oscars channel. Youtube shows their subscribers as 1.92 million.
But a quick look at their videos shows us that they aren't getting the kind of views they should be with that many subscribers ... not even close. Here are the figures for their last 18 videos
The first three (in bold) are serious anomalies. The video that 281k was a puff piece by Kathleen Kennedy (head of LucasFilm) and attracted so much negative reaction that they had to turn off comments and disable likes/dislikes because the ratio was extremely negative. When they disabled the comments people went to the video posted immediate before it, and the one posted immediately after it and kept slagging her off there.
The only possible conclusion is that the Oscars channel does not have 1.92 million legitimate subscribers ... or they would have much higher views.
It's entirely possible that Fox have done the same thing to cover up.
Many who were offed in nursing homes had recurring charges to their card. It should taper off when they've bled the accounts dry.
The subscribers are 1. political pundits and 2. boomers who know how to do about three things online including watching Fox on the mytubes.
Mate ... the number of subscribers a channel like Fox has is controlled only by the decision they've made on how many subscribers to pay for.
Let's go with a less controversial channel on youtube ... the Oscars channel. Youtube shows their subscribers as 1.92 million.
But a quick look at their videos shows us that they aren't getting the kind of views they should be with that many subscribers ... not even close. Here are the figures for their last 18 videos
47k, 281k, 20k, 11k, 6.9k, 15k, 4.1k, 3.6k, 2.8k, 2.8k, 3.5k, 2.2k, 2.1k, 2k, 1.6k, 2.2k, 2.4k, 2.3k
The first three (in bold) are serious anomalies. The video that 281k was a puff piece by Kathleen Kennedy (head of LucasFilm) and attracted so much negative reaction that they had to turn off comments and disable likes/dislikes because the ratio was extremely negative. When they disabled the comments people went to the video posted immediate before it, and the one posted immediately after it and kept slagging her off there.
The only possible conclusion is that the Oscars channel does not have 1.92 million legitimate subscribers ... or they would have much higher views.
It's entirely possible that Fox have done the same thing to cover up.
coming to think of it actually