2964 SCOTUS is Scrotum: Our Supreme Court Goes Full Nicaragua in PA Election Case (www.americanthinker.com) THE RESISTANCE posted 50 days ago by ENVYNITAZ 50 days ago by ENVYNITAZ +2967 / -3 195 comments share 195 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (195) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 218 ▼ – Stefanos 218 points 50 days ago +219 / -1 Before inauguration: "You have no standing" After inauguration: "This already happened so we're not going to look at it". permalink save report block reply ▲ 28 ▼ – SparrowHawk 28 points 50 days ago +30 / -2 But standing doesn't have to do with when the case was filed, does it? Trying to learn here. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 73 ▼ – Stefanos 73 points 50 days ago +73 / -0 Correct. Standing is legitimacy to raise the case. so, to rephrase my comment- Before inauguration: "You have no right to raise this case, because it doesnt affect you" After inauguration: "This already happened so we're not going to look at it". permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – SparrowHawk 3 points 50 days ago +3 / -0 Thank you - the no standing argument was peak bullshit. As if Texas isn't impacted by who is president? permalink parent save report block reply
Before inauguration: "You have no standing" After inauguration: "This already happened so we're not going to look at it".
But standing doesn't have to do with when the case was filed, does it? Trying to learn here.
Correct. Standing is legitimacy to raise the case. so, to rephrase my comment-
Before inauguration: "You have no right to raise this case, because it doesnt affect you"
After inauguration: "This already happened so we're not going to look at it".
Thank you - the no standing argument was peak bullshit. As if Texas isn't impacted by who is president?