This article sucks or I lack reading comprehension. Was this case about the Kansas state capital or the US capital. I'm guessing Kansas.I'd also like to know who the defendant is. Was it one of the two we've got on camera dressed in black and smashing doors/windows while the rest of the group tries to stop them?
Just read the BI article instead. It's bullshit, but at least provides more details.
This defendant glows for sure.
Despite the nonstop fake news narrative that the Capitol Riot was Trump's fault, a judge just gave it to an insurrectionist who tried to scapegoat his actions on Trump. The lawsuit, which took place in Kansas, alleged that the plaintiff was simply doing Trump's bidding when he stormed the Capitol. According to Business Insider, the man was charged with multiple counts which included "conspiracy to civil disorder, threatening to assault federal law enforcement, and entering a restricted area with a weapon."
Here's an archive of the BI article this is based on.
There was a "riot" at the Kansas state capital on the same day. Posters here have been using a video from Kansas and playing it off as from DC for weeks.
Anyway, the Daily Fodder excerpt of the BI article leaves out a lot. The BI article is full of inflammatory bullshit, but includes important details.
This article sucks
or I lack reading comprehension. Was this case about the Kansas state capital or the US capital. I'm guessing Kansas.I'd also like to know who the defendant is. Was it one of the two we've got on camera dressed in black and smashing doors/windows while the rest of the group tries to stop them?Just read the BI article instead. It's bullshit, but at least provides more details. This defendant glows for sure.Seriously? The article says "The Capitol Riot" in it. . . like. . .
The guy lives in Kansas, so the lawsuit took place in Kansas.
There was a "riot" at the Kansas state capital on the same day. Posters here have been using a video from Kansas and playing it off as from DC for weeks.
Anyway, the Daily Fodder excerpt of the BI article leaves out a lot. The BI article is full of inflammatory bullshit, but includes important details.