2841
Comments (388)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
MikesBigJockstrap 10 points ago +10 / -0

Is it bad that I'd rather him have it than those two? He might be a kid sniffing weirdo, but I 100% believe that crazy Nancy would nuke Mar-A-Lago

6
FuckPlebbit 6 points ago +6 / -0

The advantage of his dementia is that he'd likely forget he has the nuclear codes so he wouldn't be likely to use them, not to mention the MIC doesn't want to start a nuclear war, they just want to sell more crappy equipment to the military for more corruption.

Pelosi is insane enough, as you said, to actually use it. Same with Kamala.

1
Philhelm 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Biden deserves to hang for his crimes and burn in a lake of fire, but he isn't really our biggest threat.

0
RussianLimbaugh 0 points ago +0 / -0

There is no choosing the “lesser” of two evils with them. It’s about estimating the best chance for survival & hoping to fight that mess.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

That means keeping Bidet and ditching Piglosi and Kameltoe

1
RussianLimbaugh 1 point ago +1 / -0

China, et al. are behind both, they’re all anti-America, & all have puppet masters that are worse than they are. How is keeping Biden any different than Kamala (who’s making his Head of State calls) & Pelosi (who’s been mafia-ing the House for decades) running the show? Biden isn’t pushing back on them. They’re in tandem. If we are able to oust any of them from their positions, it’ll make no difference to those behind the curtain. They have had diversity hires groomed & ready to go for decades.