493
Comments (68)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
23
Tomm 23 points ago +27 / -4

Ages 35, 37, 39, 34. Yikes.

10
VirtueVeritas 10 points ago +11 / -1

Do people really think it’s that unusual for women to have babies in their thirties?

4
markolbb 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not unusual these days, no, but it certainly isn't ideal. It's a lot easier to conceive and have a healthy birth during the 20s.

3
deleted 3 points ago +8 / -5
19
VirtueVeritas 19 points ago +19 / -0

No they don’t. It does after 40.

3
BishPeas 3 points ago +3 / -0

They start to consider more risky 35+

15
ShampocalypseWOW 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yeah that's really not true. It might for some women who have health risks, but healthy women are fine having kids well into their 30's.

5
consumptiveballerina 5 points ago +5 / -0

What? Does that seem old?

14
semblanceofsanity 14 points ago +17 / -3

Anything after 35 is considered a geriatric pregnancy, so it's not young. It's best to be finishing up having kids by then.

7
chelthing 7 points ago +8 / -1

Just finished my 20s and have 4. Totally worth it.

6
Trump2024 6 points ago +7 / -1

I picked up a chick last weekend and we were fooling around almost to the knocking boots part and she said "before we go further I want to tell you I'm 41 and need to get a baby inside me before it's too late". I noped out.

3
consumptiveballerina 3 points ago +3 / -0

All of my evidence is empirical, but it's not nearly as rare as it used to be. Older mothers, that is. I had my daughter when I was 28. My OB told me it's good to have a baby "so young," and I thought, WTF, I'm not young.

As a Millennial, I feel as if most of my peers have just started having kids, while we've been done for years.

4
MapleLeafMAGA 4 points ago +5 / -1

Exactly what I was going to point out.

0
randylaheydidit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ugh. Modern women