They always get down in the weeds with the "ITS A CHOICE OR IT ISNT A CHOICE" etc -
I don't really care either way. I think it's a choice, but maybe it isn't maybe it's ingrained. Getting wrapped up in that argument bogs you down in their bullshit - you can't prove it is or isn't a choice.
What really needs to be addressed here isn't that these people want to have gay sex - it's that they want to be free to break whatever social mores they want whenever they want because it "affirms their identity". On top of that they want YOU to embrace it no matter what as well.
This is the problem. People get caught up in this bullshit argument. The question shouldn't be "is it a choice" the question should be "why should society, which constitutes a vast majority of straight men and women - be forced to make concessions for your identity?"
Gay men want to fuck butt? Fine - do it at home, be quiet about it, conform to the rest of society.
Women want to munch box - fine do it at home, be quiet about it, conform to the rest of society.
Man wants to believe he's a woman. Who's stopping you - feel like you're a woman. Hell, if you can PASS - then do so and go whole hog and people will start calling you by the pronouns you so readily desire. Otherwise, pretend your a woman at home, be quiet about it, wear normal clothes, conform to the rest of society.
We fight the battles on the ground they want all the time, and we lose - and then because we lose, they are able to advance further. We should have been arguing from the beginning that it doesn't matter if it is a choice or not - what matters is if society has to make concessions - which the answer to that should have been no. Instead they made the argument "is it a choice or not" with the important part "how do we get to 'express' ourselves" assumed to hinge on if it is or isn't a choice.
They always get down in the weeds with the "ITS A CHOICE OR IT ISNT A CHOICE" etc -
I don't really care either way. I think it's a choice, but maybe it isn't maybe it's ingrained. Getting wrapped up in that argument bogs you down in their bullshit - you can't prove it is or isn't a choice.
What really needs to be addressed here isn't that these people want to have gay sex - it's that they want to be free to break whatever social mores they want whenever they want because it "affirms their identity". On top of that they want YOU to embrace it no matter what as well.
This is the problem. People get caught up in this bullshit argument. The question shouldn't be "is it a choice" the question should be "why should society, which constitutes a vast majority of straight men and women - be forced to make concessions for your identity?"
Gay men want to fuck butt? Fine - do it at home, be quiet about it, conform to the rest of society.
Women want to munch box - fine do it at home, be quiet about it, conform to the rest of society.
Man wants to believe he's a woman. Who's stopping you - feel like you're a woman. Hell, if you can PASS - then do so and go whole hog and people will start calling you by the pronouns you so readily desire. Otherwise, pretend your a woman at home, be quiet about it, wear normal clothes, conform to the rest of society.
We fight the battles on the ground they want all the time, and we lose - and then because we lose, they are able to advance further. We should have been arguing from the beginning that it doesn't matter if it is a choice or not - what matters is if society has to make concessions - which the answer to that should have been no. Instead they made the argument "is it a choice or not" with the important part "how do we get to 'express' ourselves" assumed to hinge on if it is or isn't a choice.
most excellent missive pede . . .