2673
Comments (183)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Truthseeeeker 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you checked the raw data you will have seen that 2020 had much more deaths than any other year since 2001.

1
NataliesFeet 1 point ago +1 / -0

While that may be true, it had similar amount of deaths as a bad flu season.

https://principia-scientific.com/uk-covid-conundrum-the-mysterious-case-of-disappearing-flu/

1
Truthseeeeker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly I think we are arguing different things here. I’ve never looked at any flu statistics because I found them to be irrelevant, as I find total deaths to be more indicative.

The total deaths for 2020 are higher than any year since 2001 so I don’t think you can just write off Covid as something that is hoax or fake. That being said, I do not think that it was worth locking down the whole UK for this as the deaths aren’t high enough for me to rationalise a lockdown, and they should have just done more to protect high risk groups.

1
NataliesFeet 1 point ago +1 / -0

How much higher though? That is my point. By "higher", do you mean by hundreds of thousands? Or by higher do you mean a few hundred - because although technically higher, if the death rate is within a few hundred them they are SIMILAR.

1
Truthseeeeker 1 point ago +1 / -0

The number of deaths in 2020 above the 5 year average was approximately 85,000. Bear in mind the population of the UK is smaller than the USA.