11
posted ago by dataonly ago by dataonly +12 / -1

That said our state has always had machines. NO paper record. The old machines required you to pull a lever to close the curtain and record the vote. They were mechanical.

We use walk-in electronic machines now that still have a curtain.

Much has made about blockchain being the way votes are cast in the future. The same folks are worried about EMP's.

Comments (5)
sorted by:
2
Big_Sam_Handwich 2 points ago +2 / -0

What if BOTH systems were used in parallel? This way the 2 can be compared in an audit. It would make fraud very hard to conduct.

Basically voters would fill out a paper ballot, which would,get hand-counted. Then they would vote again via electronic block chain system. The two separate tallies should end up pretty darn close.

2
BasedNtruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Machines should be banned from voting, period. Idgaf about blockchain security etc, the politicians clearly want machines because it’s soo much easier to manipulate votes.

1
no-one 1 point ago +1 / -0

Paper ballots, voter Identification, signature verification, retained for at least 2 years and a strict chain of custody would go a LONG way to fix the problems with this country.

2
dataonly [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Streaming video monitoring of the counting process. If a casino can do it....

0
borscht-nazi 0 points ago +2 / -2

kek

Some people will never learn (that universal suffrage is the most idiotic idea ever implemented).