You're saying we wouldn't be in the globalist bankers' clutches if the corporate fascists, who were themselves created and backed by the globalist bankers, had won instead of the bolsheviks, who were also created and backed by the globalist bankers?
Why would one flavour of globalist rule be better than another?
In 1913, Germany was trying to be globally dominant.
From 1914-1918, the globalist bankers used their newly established US Federal Reserve to commence a virtuous cycle of lending, buying assets, borrowing against those assets, buying more assets, and so on. The tremendous profits of this fraud were directed at Germany in the form of the war. Post belle epoque Germany's industrial might was such that all of this might not have been enough, as there is reason to believe deep cover freemasons (servants of the British Crown) put the Kaiser's family in check and would have offed them unless the Kaiser surrendered and stepped down. This would explain why Germany was the only continental power to survive with its industry intact.
From 1918-1933, the allies plundered Germany, and the German peoples' righteous anger at what had been done to them since 1914 grew from a simmer to a rolling boil. The German Workers' Party was patriots, protected by patriots in the SA, and their aims were noble (though their socialist bent was misguided). A rising strong Germany posed the very same threat to the globalist bankers in 1914 as it did in 1933, so the globalist bankers took control of the Nazi party. I suspect Hitler sold his soul to the bankers in 1932 after Hindenburg's victory. The Nazis were crushed, then the globalist bankers in Wall Street brought them back to life with new funding. I do not believe for a second that this funding came with no strings attached.
From 1933-1939, Hitler was shown by the globalists how to optimally use fiat currency to rapidly (re)build an economy. Germany was strong again!
From 1939 to 1945, Hitler ensured Germany's armies did nothing to harm the parties which had been behind Germany's woes from 1914-1933. The City of London, the Swiss bankers, none of them were harmed in any way. But the traditional enemy of the globalist bankers, the Russians, were harmed very greatly indeed. As were the German patriots who signed up to fight for their country, as their zeal was wasted in the Russian winter instead of fighting Germany's true enemies.
From 1945 onwards, Germany has been the globalists' base of operations for subduing Europe. Today, they're mere steps away from conquering the entire continent... save a few salient city states, that is.
TLDR? I think it is important to distinguish between the average German citizen who just wanted the madness of WW1 and Weimar to end, and the SS occult elite, who were dancing to the globalist bankers' tune all along. We can opposed globalism and communism without falling into the bankers' false dichotomy.
Hitler didnt do anything wrong. Stop larping with the jewspeak and learn some actual history. We’re in this mess today because hitler lost.
You're saying we wouldn't be in the globalist bankers' clutches if the corporate fascists, who were themselves created and backed by the globalist bankers, had won instead of the bolsheviks, who were also created and backed by the globalist bankers?
Why would one flavour of globalist rule be better than another?
Germany was trying to be globally dominant. They wanted to just take care of themselves.
In 1913, Germany was trying to be globally dominant.
From 1914-1918, the globalist bankers used their newly established US Federal Reserve to commence a virtuous cycle of lending, buying assets, borrowing against those assets, buying more assets, and so on. The tremendous profits of this fraud were directed at Germany in the form of the war. Post belle epoque Germany's industrial might was such that all of this might not have been enough, as there is reason to believe deep cover freemasons (servants of the British Crown) put the Kaiser's family in check and would have offed them unless the Kaiser surrendered and stepped down. This would explain why Germany was the only continental power to survive with its industry intact.
From 1918-1933, the allies plundered Germany, and the German peoples' righteous anger at what had been done to them since 1914 grew from a simmer to a rolling boil. The German Workers' Party was patriots, protected by patriots in the SA, and their aims were noble (though their socialist bent was misguided). A rising strong Germany posed the very same threat to the globalist bankers in 1914 as it did in 1933, so the globalist bankers took control of the Nazi party. I suspect Hitler sold his soul to the bankers in 1932 after Hindenburg's victory. The Nazis were crushed, then the globalist bankers in Wall Street brought them back to life with new funding. I do not believe for a second that this funding came with no strings attached.
From 1933-1939, Hitler was shown by the globalists how to optimally use fiat currency to rapidly (re)build an economy. Germany was strong again!
From 1939 to 1945, Hitler ensured Germany's armies did nothing to harm the parties which had been behind Germany's woes from 1914-1933. The City of London, the Swiss bankers, none of them were harmed in any way. But the traditional enemy of the globalist bankers, the Russians, were harmed very greatly indeed. As were the German patriots who signed up to fight for their country, as their zeal was wasted in the Russian winter instead of fighting Germany's true enemies.
From 1945 onwards, Germany has been the globalists' base of operations for subduing Europe. Today, they're mere steps away from conquering the entire continent... save a few salient city states, that is.
TLDR? I think it is important to distinguish between the average German citizen who just wanted the madness of WW1 and Weimar to end, and the SS occult elite, who were dancing to the globalist bankers' tune all along. We can opposed globalism and communism without falling into the bankers' false dichotomy.