If someone says "it's great to win the lottery", they're not expressing pride in their prowess at lottery-winning. They're just making a statement attesting that winning the lottery has a large positive side.
"Diversity" means we want more black people. "It's great to be white" means we want more white people.
I've seen enough of these types of threads where you guys talk about hating little kids waving American flags, deporting all non-white people and praising Hitler to know exactly what you guys are about.
How has civic nationalism, the idea that we’re all Americans, all bleed red, blah blah blah, work out for White people? Most of the people who think this are White Gentiles, like Pres. Trump. The majority of non-White Gentiles are tribal. White people must band together to defend our rights and advance our interests like every other group. If we don’t,?we’re headed for extinction via extermination and miscegenation.
Civic nationalism worked out the same way for everybody regardless of race. It is the tribalism that you hold in so much disdain that is causing the black racism you hate so much. And you want to become one of them. How ironic.
Civic nationalism only works in a homogenous society. It didn't work that well in the 90% White but multiethnic America of the 1950s.
Excerpt from Der Spiegel (August 2005) interview with Lee Kuan Yew. He hits the situation on the head:
SPIEGEL: During your career, you have kept your distance from Western style democracy. Are you still convinced that an authoritarian system is the future for Asia?
Mr. Lee: Why should I be against democracy? The British came here, never gave me democracy, except when they were about to leave. But I cannot run my system based on their rules. I have to amend it to fit my people's position. In multiracial societies, you don't vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion. Supposing I'd run their system here, Malays would vote for Muslims, Indians would vote for Indians, Chinese would vote for Chinese. I would have a constant clash in my Parliament which cannot be resolved because the Chinese majority would always overrule them. So I found a formula that changes that...
White Gentiles vote as individuals but the majority of non-White Gentiles band together and vote their group interests. The outcome is that Whites have been in retreat since the 1960s. Do you consider this the ethical thing to do? In the end either our backs will be to the wall and we'll have to fight or we will be wiped off the face of the earth. Is that what you want?
What is your problem, dumb ass? Do you not understand the difference between comparative and superlative? I explicitly said, "not better than." Are you capable of understanding that? "X is great" does not equal "X is the greatest." Stop posting stupid responses, no one gives a shit. Take your virtue signaling somewhere else, pussy.
Where do these fag types come from? Why would you even be on these boards if you're a virtue signaler? Take that shit somewhere else. I'm pushing back against anti-white rhetoric. Is that ok with you, fucknub? If not, what the fuck is wrong with it? "Oh someone could misinterpret..." yes, off course, they always do anyway. So what? Who cares?
You'll proud of an immutable characteristic. Congrats, you are as retarded as Black Lives Matter.
If someone says "it's great to win the lottery", they're not expressing pride in their prowess at lottery-winning. They're just making a statement attesting that winning the lottery has a large positive side.
Yeah, and "Diversity" just means inclusion. I get enough doublespeak garbage from the Left. No thanks.
Doublespeak garbage is reading "it's great to be [something]" and willfully misinterpreting it to be saying/meaning "I'm proud of [something]"
Do you understand the difference between thinking something is great and being proud of something?
"Diversity" means we want more black people. "It's great to be white" means we want more white people.
I've seen enough of these types of threads where you guys talk about hating little kids waving American flags, deporting all non-white people and praising Hitler to know exactly what you guys are about.
How has civic nationalism, the idea that we’re all Americans, all bleed red, blah blah blah, work out for White people? Most of the people who think this are White Gentiles, like Pres. Trump. The majority of non-White Gentiles are tribal. White people must band together to defend our rights and advance our interests like every other group. If we don’t,?we’re headed for extinction via extermination and miscegenation.
Civic nationalism worked out the same way for everybody regardless of race. It is the tribalism that you hold in so much disdain that is causing the black racism you hate so much. And you want to become one of them. How ironic.
Civic nationalism only works in a homogenous society. It didn't work that well in the 90% White but multiethnic America of the 1950s.
Excerpt from Der Spiegel (August 2005) interview with Lee Kuan Yew. He hits the situation on the head:
SPIEGEL: During your career, you have kept your distance from Western style democracy. Are you still convinced that an authoritarian system is the future for Asia?
Mr. Lee: Why should I be against democracy? The British came here, never gave me democracy, except when they were about to leave. But I cannot run my system based on their rules. I have to amend it to fit my people's position. In multiracial societies, you don't vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion. Supposing I'd run their system here, Malays would vote for Muslims, Indians would vote for Indians, Chinese would vote for Chinese. I would have a constant clash in my Parliament which cannot be resolved because the Chinese majority would always overrule them. So I found a formula that changes that...
Source https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/economics-its-stupid-to-be-afraid-lee-kuan-yew-to-der-spiegel.85421/
White Gentiles vote as individuals but the majority of non-White Gentiles band together and vote their group interests. The outcome is that Whites have been in retreat since the 1960s. Do you consider this the ethical thing to do? In the end either our backs will be to the wall and we'll have to fight or we will be wiped off the face of the earth. Is that what you want?
What is your problem, dumb ass? Do you not understand the difference between comparative and superlative? I explicitly said, "not better than." Are you capable of understanding that? "X is great" does not equal "X is the greatest." Stop posting stupid responses, no one gives a shit. Take your virtue signaling somewhere else, pussy.
All I want is a white homeland and to deport the non-whites. Hitler was right.
Where do these fag types come from? Why would you even be on these boards if you're a virtue signaler? Take that shit somewhere else. I'm pushing back against anti-white rhetoric. Is that ok with you, fucknub? If not, what the fuck is wrong with it? "Oh someone could misinterpret..." yes, off course, they always do anyway. So what? Who cares?
No, man. You're a tribalist. Just like the people you hate so much.