Mike, sir,, please understand sir, you have the same support and respect as Trump does, and I truly mean that. We have as much patriotic love and respectful admiration for you, as we did for Trump on Jan. 6th. That Mr. Lindell, is fact. Thank you for the patriotism you have given to this country, and the people who support out 45th President, President Trump.
Source on that? Last I heard, the fence sitters were complaining that it wasn't sourced, and therefore -could- be false. Due to the nature of the information, and that I've seen quite a lot of information the corroborates it being true, which has been sourced at the time, I'd need to see an actual source on it being false.
Given the complexity and detail of the information, and that it corroborates with other sourced information, I would say it's highly unlikely it's false simply because it's unsourced. If they're faking it, it would be a lot easier and more effective to fake other information. The IP data was quite detailed, and would be unnecessarily difficult to fake.
Information WITH sources is faked all the time, just look at the MSM. Even if it did have a source, why would we trust them? You need to take this particular information as exactly what it is, unconfirmed information that strongly corroborates with other related information. There's no way that every bit of information is going to be cut and dry, black and white.
In an era where they are going after the people investigating the election with swat teams, car bombs, and crushing lawsuits, I'm not surprised they didn't exactly scream the source to the heavens.
True or false is binary. If it is not false, it must be true.
However, Mr. Semantics, if you want to be that specific... I never said it was TRUE, (as it is impossible for me or anyone to be able to fully confirm it), I only said I believe it - for all of the reasons that I listed above.
My mypillow order is out for delivery today. Yeah!!!
I’m waiting on my latest order of a throw blanket, then I’ll decide what to order next.
Mike, sir,, please understand sir, you have the same support and respect as Trump does, and I truly mean that. We have as much patriotic love and respectful admiration for you, as we did for Trump on Jan. 6th. That Mr. Lindell, is fact. Thank you for the patriotism you have given to this country, and the people who support out 45th President, President Trump.
Trump(s)
Lindell
Flynn
DeSantis. Those are the men I trust.
Gaetz
If is still planning to run for Gov of MN he has my vote.
That comment alone makes me want to buy more pillows, I’m all stocked up, now time for gifts for all my family...
What’s the second part of this statement? He wouldn’t have risked it all unless....? Unless what?
Everyone is given false information. There has hardly ever been a more complicated and nuanced situation on such a wide scale.
A lot of true information has been given to him as well.
Source on that? Last I heard, the fence sitters were complaining that it wasn't sourced, and therefore -could- be false. Due to the nature of the information, and that I've seen quite a lot of information the corroborates it being true, which has been sourced at the time, I'd need to see an actual source on it being false.
Given the complexity and detail of the information, and that it corroborates with other sourced information, I would say it's highly unlikely it's false simply because it's unsourced. If they're faking it, it would be a lot easier and more effective to fake other information. The IP data was quite detailed, and would be unnecessarily difficult to fake.
Information WITH sources is faked all the time, just look at the MSM. Even if it did have a source, why would we trust them? You need to take this particular information as exactly what it is, unconfirmed information that strongly corroborates with other related information. There's no way that every bit of information is going to be cut and dry, black and white.
In an era where they are going after the people investigating the election with swat teams, car bombs, and crushing lawsuits, I'm not surprised they didn't exactly scream the source to the heavens.
Because it's not false.
True or false is binary. If it is not false, it must be true.
However, Mr. Semantics, if you want to be that specific... I never said it was TRUE, (as it is impossible for me or anyone to be able to fully confirm it), I only said I believe it - for all of the reasons that I listed above.
Do you watch Scott Adams?