2533
Comments (238)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Hillarys_Ballsack 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are correct, and we need people like you at FOB. The Dems are playing chess here: they installed a black woman as the VP frontrunner for a reason. They've done their calculations and know Noem's on the line-up. She's hard to beat: she can take 50% of their base as the first female president, and 100% of the GOP because she's got both the RINOs and Trumpsters. If the GOP run her, she's unbeatable; none of the DNC puppets can beat her. They're thinking in decades; we're thinking 2016. JoeBama is running on the fumes as the first black president's assistant, and they think they need an Oprah.

This isn't about race, it's about girls and a re-run of 2016. We've had 30 years of movies about female presidents. If the GOP run a woman, it's game over. They take the biggest prize. The question is which woman. They've put theirs on their board, and she's a disaster. The intersectional game looks like it's been won, but it's a catastrophe for them if we find someone better.

Ric is the Rook on the chess board. It double-outflanks the Dems on the left in their own identity politics game. We run a woman and a gay on a conservative ticket, and they are done. The next step is the tranny health secretary or one of their Oregon anarchists.

Now, let's say someone digs up the dirt Newsome got on HeelsUp and knocks her out of the game before the next election cycle, and THEN we run Noem. That's the ballgame.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very entertaining analysis.

I'm hoping events change enough to make all of it moot.