When I asked you what a person ought to do under different circumstances, your every answer was either "shut up" or "shoot them to death". For someone who doesn't want to shed blood, you sure are quick to recommend it as the only recourse.
I suggest an alternative that permits of defending your own property, but also being able to join hands to resolve issues that don't involve breaking-and-entering.
The world doesn't stop existing at the boundaries of your land.
When I asked you what a person ought to do under different circumstances, your every answer was either "shut up" or "shoot them to death". For someone who doesn't want to shed blood, you sure are quick to recommend it as the only recourse.
If someone breaks on to your property yes you should shoot them.
The alternative you suggest still involves guns, just wielded by police who show up too late to help.
I suggest an alternative that permits of defending your own property, but also being able to join hands to resolve issues that don't involve breaking-and-entering.
The world doesn't stop existing at the boundaries of your land.