1738 Shared Shame...."Kavanaugh's and Barrett's post-election decisions are not (only) a betrayal of Republicans or the President...They're a betrayal to 'We the People' and the Constitution." (amgreatness.com) posted 48 days ago by ReorderPoint 48 days ago by ReorderPoint +1738 / -0 68 comments share 68 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (68) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 1 ▼ – jtt888 1 point 48 days ago +1 / -0 I'm not going to search the Internet for you. It's not hard. Try it. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – streakybacon 1 point 48 days ago +1 / -0 It's a rhetorical question, have you heard of one? I'm asking because I don't think they've done anything. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – jtt888 0 points 48 days ago +0 / -0 Is that "done" like figuring out what "is" is? They are 2 of 9. Nobody in legal arena is perfect, but liberals sure hate them. Just some random articles. https://clarion.causeaction.com/2021/02/22/inexplicable-alito-and-thomas-dissent-as-supreme-court-strikes-down-pennsylvania-election-lawsuit/ https://www.npr.org/2020/10/05/920416357/justices-thomas-alito-blast-supreme-court-decision-on-gay-marriage-rights https://www.newsweek.com/justice-alito-right-freedom-speech-religion-face-real-threats-opinion-1548133 https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/01/none-to-the-right-of-samuel-alito/431946/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/10/21/supreme-court-clarence-thomas-25-years-scalia/92063306/ permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – streakybacon 1 point 48 days ago +1 / -0 That's what I'm saying, all they've "done" is give lip service to several issues. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – jtt888 1 point 48 days ago +1 / -0 All they can do is give opinions on the court and agree or dissent. They are also outspoken on conservative constitutional approach to the law. Not sure what you'd be expecting. permalink parent save report block reply
I'm not going to search the Internet for you. It's not hard. Try it.
It's a rhetorical question, have you heard of one?
I'm asking because I don't think they've done anything.
Is that "done" like figuring out what "is" is? They are 2 of 9. Nobody in legal arena is perfect, but liberals sure hate them. Just some random articles. https://clarion.causeaction.com/2021/02/22/inexplicable-alito-and-thomas-dissent-as-supreme-court-strikes-down-pennsylvania-election-lawsuit/
https://www.npr.org/2020/10/05/920416357/justices-thomas-alito-blast-supreme-court-decision-on-gay-marriage-rights
https://www.newsweek.com/justice-alito-right-freedom-speech-religion-face-real-threats-opinion-1548133
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/01/none-to-the-right-of-samuel-alito/431946/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/10/21/supreme-court-clarence-thomas-25-years-scalia/92063306/
That's what I'm saying, all they've "done" is give lip service to several issues.
All they can do is give opinions on the court and agree or dissent. They are also outspoken on conservative constitutional approach to the law. Not sure what you'd be expecting.