2733
Comments (76)
sorted by:
115
Siteless_Vagrant 115 points ago +124 / -9

Also Senator Paul: votes to accept the electoral votes from the most openly fraudulent election in world history because orange man bad.

67
ProphetOfKek 67 points ago +71 / -4

Yup. He’s back in politician mode, pandering to win us back. Talk is cheap, Rand.

2
Amaroq64 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, he's probably the only one in there who would condemn bombing syria no matter who is in the white house.

1
Independenceforever 1 point ago +1 / -0

No he isn't.

He's a fraud.

He's betrayed his roots every step of the way.

quit taking the RINO bait.

I wanted to love him, but he's a fraud. Sucks I know.

25
NotAPuma 25 points ago +26 / -1

Only people getting re Elected, should be Tuberville, Hawley, and anyone else Trump endorses.

25
BeefChucker 25 points ago +27 / -2

Trump endorsed McConnell Barr and all these SCOTUS picks. We need to judge people by their actions. Only 7 senators voted to sustain the Pennsylvania electoral objection. I don't know how many for the other states.

14
Scooby 14 points ago +14 / -0

Zero senators objected to GA despite negative votes, votes with decimal points, and fucking video surveillance. They are all compromised traitors and I'm getting discouraged that so many people are forgetting and praising some of these cunts again.

10
AnonymousFrog 10 points ago +10 / -0

And Kelly Loeffler used the Boomer Brigade Capitol Invasion to justify not objecting. As if, even if it were legitimate, a few people acting up justifies letting election fraud stand.

5
Redpillgirlfrommars 5 points ago +5 / -0

That googly-eyed bitch had no intentions of objecting in the first place. She realized she fucked herself not “fighting for trump” and at the literal last minute said “okie doke ok guys haha vote for me so I can object! Pinky swears I will!!”.

And no one fell for her shit (and the dems cheated anyways because why not, not like anyone is going to do anything) and she lost.

Then the 6th came and it was her perfect opportunity to back out of what she swore to her constituents.

Fuck her. Fuck all of them.

2
BeefChucker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Zero? Really? After the suitcases full of fake ballots video?

1
NotAPuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump had to endorse the SCOTUS Picks, because

A. They were from the Federalist, which until recently, 90% of Republicans believed to be quite Conservative, and Quite Pro-Trump

B. Mitch McConnell wouldn't have voted for any other picks.

Mitch McConnell and the Senate was running the show during Trump's First Term. That needs to be changed during Trump's 2nd Term.

1
BeefChucker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump will not have another term. He can talk about figuratively fighting etc but you need elections in states that add up to 270 electoral votes.

3
Siteless_Vagrant 3 points ago +3 / -0

I got a bad feeling Trump is gonna endorse snakes like Rand Paul and that comedian from Texas with the eyepatch, though. I HOPE he doesn't, and finds some actual regular people to give a hand up, but he's backed RINO'S before.

1
NotAPuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unlikely, unless he can't find someone trustworthy to primary them. Because, atleast Republicans/RINOs will vote correctly on somethings, like 2nd Amendment, and the $15 Minimum Wage.

Better a RINO wins instead of a Democrat. But I'm sure he will find someone to replace that moron Crenshaw, and Rand Paul, and Mitch McConnel, but it's up to us to GIVE Trump, people to replace these fucks. We need to be lining up outside of Mar-A-Lago, ready to submit our Application.

1
Independenceforever 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ron DeSantis is his governor.

Many of us have been working hard in FL.

6
yukondave 6 points ago +8 / -2

That vote was dead on arrival and everyone knows it. Where were the protests after the vote? All of that tough talk and now complain others were backed down?

The secret police was in full show of force and yes they ran bank records to find who were our organisers and have scared us into silence. Remember while they were taking out country, they called our gatherings riots and insurrection.

6
beta-detector 6 points ago +9 / -3

In defense of Paul, they tried to kill him on at least 3 occasions that we know. First was "Baseball Shooting", second was his "neighbor" attacked him and third one was when he got surrounded by BLM/ANTIFA in the street. .. so he is playing safe.

2
magacoder 2 points ago +4 / -2

Don't bitch out to people trying to intimidate you. It makes them stronger.

2
Tellsyouhow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope. They also surrounded Mitch McConnells house and Tucker Carlsons house when they didn't get their way and they bitched out too.

Bending over at the first sign of bad press is ingrained into establishment republicans

1
Klown_Schwab 1 point ago +2 / -1

"If the MSM newspapers think they can intimidate the MAGA movement with their hidden threats... they'd better watch out! Our patience has its limits. One day we'll shut their dirty lying journo mouths!"

2
Amaroq64 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who said that?

0
Klown_Schwab 0 points ago +1 / -1

The Bad German Man's propaganda minister. I altered it from the original lol

1
dianabrown1 1 point ago +2 / -1

You know, I think Mr. Paul doesnt give a rats ass what anyone threatens him or his family with. I get the impression he will take a stand regardless. His family is likely of the same making so Id bet stand with him in his decisions. I could be wrong because I dont know them but that is the impression I get from Mr. Paul.

-2
Siteless_Vagrant -2 points ago +1 / -3

Of FFS, his neighbor decked him because he's a pompous arrogant asshole, and he WALKED IN TO THE CROWD OF BLM ANTIFA FOR A FUCKING PHOTO OP. As far as the baseball shooting, that wasn't directed AT Rand, but at the whole group.

3
beta-detector 3 points ago +4 / -1

You have the gift I envy - reading other people's minds 👏😎

2
TrumpIncitedErection 2 points ago +2 / -0

At last, something Psaki won't want to "circle back" to

26
JwPATX 26 points ago +26 / -0

Wait till “Assad” starts “gassing citizens” again when he hasn’t “done that,” for 4 years.

11
Sunnybats2 [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Trump's biggest mistake after choosing Bill Gates over RFK Jr was listening to Nikki Haley and the #BritishFilth to bomb Syria!

24
Turnerscreek 24 points ago +28 / -4

Rand you had a chance to stand and fight on Jan 6 but you chose to wimp out or bend the knee to your owners. I can no longer vote for you or your teammates.

2
dianabrown1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree the RNC is dead. It was burined in pieces after 11/3/2020 election. Cant wait to see what comes after it.

12
Titan93 12 points ago +12 / -0

No one will ask, truth is not allowed in a communist press room

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
8
Tellsyouhow 8 points ago +8 / -0

They used to be so convincing to me, but now I believe absolutely nothing they say. The tougher the talk, the more likely I am to disregard their statements as calculated bullshit to get votes/money.

3
Mitschu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Talk is free.

At most, they get silenced briefly if they roleplay too hard, and then only until they come back to do an apology tour.

Action is a sacrifice. It costs at minimum time and effort, and frequently has lasting repercussions.

Politics is a bystander who nods solemnly and says "So brave, I fully agree with what that man over there just did to save a random stranger from a fire. I proudly endorse heroic acts."

Look to what people put on the line, what they'll sacrifice, what actions they'll take, to find out what their real values are.

For 99.9% of politicians, that's "nothing." But they'll give you all the pleasant words you wish, as many as you can stomach.

For the rare counter-example, there was a politician recently who gave up his multi-billion dollar career, damaged his reputation by taking an "extreme" pro-American viewpoint, and permanently chilled most of his relationships with the same flock who used to bleat their adulation at him. Curiously enough, all the other politicians hated him and betrayed or sabotaged him at the first opportunity.

10
NeverGiveUpTrump 10 points ago +12 / -2

Paul is speaking the truth but he’s failed at supporting Trump.

8
deleted 8 points ago +16 / -8
7
Datamancer 7 points ago +7 / -0

War is now peace.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
borscht-nazi 6 points ago +9 / -3

>Assad is brutal
brutal what?

6
AnonymousFrog 6 points ago +7 / -1

Every interview I’ve heard with Assad makes him seem like one of the most reasonable people in the Middle East. Meanwhile, Biden seems like a potato.

3
Tellsyouhow 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've never actually seen an interview with him because I presume they get censored over here.

After seeing what they are capable of I do believe the Syrian conflict was deliberately set up by Western Governments to get him out of the way Gaddafi style.

The one time I heard an interview with Putin, also covering the Syria conflict from a different angle, he sounded professional and put across a different side to the story that our media weren't telling us.

6
vongregormench 6 points ago +9 / -3

It's much harder to find such a tweet from mister Paul here, since he sticks to his principles regardless of which party is in power. If you have a disagreement with Rand it's not because he turned around and stabbed you in the back, it's because he has a legitimate beef with your actions based on his past positions.

3
MarginofFraud 3 points ago +5 / -2

Thank you. Someone needed to say it. I don't always agree with Rand but he's never not stood by his principals. He called out Biden today like he called out Trump when Trump sent missiles at Syria. Rand didn't block election certification but he never believed he ever had the constitutional authority to do it in the first place (on that I disagree, but again, he's not breaking consistency). While he didn't stop certification, he also said he doesn't believe that removes the question of fraud from this election (I think that's a sucky position to hold but I can also see where he's drawing a line between what he believes happened and where he believes his authority ends). Rand was a stick in the mud over wall funding too and on that I again, disagreed, but again he was principaled about it. He's not like Mitt Romney, who just stabs Trump in the back regardless of the positions he took when he was the GOP prez nominee.

3
Tellsyouhow 3 points ago +6 / -3

Bullshit. He might say opposite views to set him apart from the rest but he's a spineless wimp who doesn't act, just talk.

The one occasion he could have taken action he folded like a wet paper bag.

Republicans didn't try and kill him, but his Democrat neighbor did. He seems to have forgotten.

3
vongregormench 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure he didn't forget the guy with a rifle shooting at him in a baseball field.

5
VoltronGreen1981 5 points ago +6 / -1

Ginger Cunt is a better way to refer to her as.

4
Destineed369 4 points ago +4 / -0

I condemn all government.

See how that works? It doesn’t mean a god damn thing. Your congress and your less than worthless.

4
MAGASquatch 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do like his snarky statement.

3
GlobalUnity 3 points ago +4 / -1

This is really a REAL reason to impeach Biden.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +3 / -2

Real reason? He is a demented, criminal pedophile who benefitted from the most massive election fraud ever seen in the western world and sold the US out to China. There are far more significant reasons to not only impeach but imprison Biden.

3
ModernKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Psaki's drones will have to circle back for Rand Paul.

3
LeeHarvey 3 points ago +3 / -0

Psaki is incoherent

3
MAG_n_KAG 3 points ago +5 / -2

what wouldve been easier paul?

standing up and fighting against election fraud to make sure Trump, the rightful president, retains his office so he can keep making common sense policies that benefit America?

or

spend the next 4 years(and most likely beyond) fighting corrupt retards that have stolen and consolidated all the power and now have free reign to retard the fuck out of the country.

to put it mildly, you fucking chose wrong you sackless little bitch

0
JackLemon 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yep. Paul is a phony piece of Schiff who deserves another beating as does almost every politucian in his traitorous party.

2
FAQ-REDDIT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Roasted. Burn ward +1 Press Secretary coming up.

Actual Press upcoming press conference... probably goes like this... What flavor ice cream does joe like. And will you please confirm, he does only gets one scoop, right ( winks and nod while asking question ).

2
Hexagon 2 points ago +2 / -0

But this was the whole point of the steal.

Sure they like the kids but they love war.

2
sneak 2 points ago +2 / -0

She'll circle back to you.

2
Mintap 2 points ago +2 / -0

No perhaps... Action required

2
tdwinner2020 2 points ago +3 / -1

I condemn Rand Paul, abettor of election thieves.

2
CynicalTwit22 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thr drone DID circle back....

2
LarryBugman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I condemn the refusal to fight the illegal installation of a potential leader who everybody knew was a warhawk. Someone should let Paul know that if he didn’t want strikes on Syria he ought to have done something to keep the most anti-war president (even accounting for the disgraceful assassination of Soleimani) in recent history in office.

2
Seenev 2 points ago +2 / -0

At what point is Psaki more liability than asset even with the media's assistance?

2
dianabrown1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Senator, IF the question is asked we already know, she is likely to "circle back." We got that message loud and clear as well as the request for questions in advance so that the lack of ability and knowledge can be better managed. You really should know that as well.

2
Skyrison 2 points ago +3 / -1

fuck him! none of these fools can EVER win me back. he's done x(

2
Kamalas_a_Bitch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jen’s gonna KirKle bacK on that one

2
BigJohnson10 2 points ago +2 / -0

They get us in all this shit! Just to fix the problem they started. What a fu%king joke!!!!!

2
Siretch 2 points ago +3 / -1

Paul and the rest should leave twitter! There are probably a thousand people with tens or hundreds of accounts that echo each others.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish he wasn't giving the platform something to see. The platform would quickly die without our side making things interesting.

2
f_bastiat 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's a circle back girl

1
DontDoxMeBro1 1 point ago +1 / -0

@POTATUS

1
streakybacon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't condemn the attacks per se necessarily, I condemn the hypocrisy however.

And if asking "what authority" he has is the best we can come up with...good luck. I hope that was an attempt to snooker Biden by his own logic and not an actual, serious question.

1
Sunnybats2 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Per se bad!

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +2 / -1

How about you tell the fucking truth, Rand? Syria's civil war isn't a civil war at all, it's a fabricated war of regime change that was orchestrated by Ukraine, Qatar, and the DNC.

0
JackLemon 0 points ago +2 / -2

Rand Paul is a gutless, two-faced bitch and needs to be shunned and ignored like every traitorous Republican.