It's much harder to find such a tweet from mister Paul here, since he sticks to his principles regardless of which party is in power. If you have a disagreement with Rand it's not because he turned around and stabbed you in the back, it's because he has a legitimate beef with your actions based on his past positions.
Thank you. Someone needed to say it. I don't always agree with Rand but he's never not stood by his principals. He called out Biden today like he called out Trump when Trump sent missiles at Syria. Rand didn't block election certification but he never believed he ever had the constitutional authority to do it in the first place (on that I disagree, but again, he's not breaking consistency). While he didn't stop certification, he also said he doesn't believe that removes the question of fraud from this election (I think that's a sucky position to hold but I can also see where he's drawing a line between what he believes happened and where he believes his authority ends). Rand was a stick in the mud over wall funding too and on that I again, disagreed, but again he was principaled about it. He's not like Mitt Romney, who just stabs Trump in the back regardless of the positions he took when he was the GOP prez nominee.
It's much harder to find such a tweet from mister Paul here, since he sticks to his principles regardless of which party is in power. If you have a disagreement with Rand it's not because he turned around and stabbed you in the back, it's because he has a legitimate beef with your actions based on his past positions.
Thank you. Someone needed to say it. I don't always agree with Rand but he's never not stood by his principals. He called out Biden today like he called out Trump when Trump sent missiles at Syria. Rand didn't block election certification but he never believed he ever had the constitutional authority to do it in the first place (on that I disagree, but again, he's not breaking consistency). While he didn't stop certification, he also said he doesn't believe that removes the question of fraud from this election (I think that's a sucky position to hold but I can also see where he's drawing a line between what he believes happened and where he believes his authority ends). Rand was a stick in the mud over wall funding too and on that I again, disagreed, but again he was principaled about it. He's not like Mitt Romney, who just stabs Trump in the back regardless of the positions he took when he was the GOP prez nominee.
Bullshit. He might say opposite views to set him apart from the rest but he's a spineless wimp who doesn't act, just talk.
The one occasion he could have taken action he folded like a wet paper bag.
Republicans didn't try and kill him, but his Democrat neighbor did. He seems to have forgotten.
Pretty sure he didn't forget the guy with a rifle shooting at him in a baseball field.