3211
Comments (165)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is 100% correct.

If all of the money that is wasted on "green" initiatives was spent on real environmental issues, the world would be a much healthier place and we'd have money left over.

2
FireannDireach 2 points ago +2 / -0

When I encounter greens and leftists and they discuss green initiatives, I have a couple of questions that completely stump them. My favorite is "So, if the sea levels are rising, and there's nothing we can do about it, why are't we spending money to build sea walls and barriers around our big cities and coasts? Surely we won't just abandon NYC, or Boston? Where is the effort to counter the rising sea levels?"

Um. Uh. Well. Ur.....

Or they lie, and say it is being addressed, but can't offer up any concrete proof of it.

I've only been able to use these questions a couple of times, but it was fun as hell when I was able to. You can also address moving farmland because of climate change, or any number of issues that would be real if "climate change" was real.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Their arguments really don't stand up to scrutiny, do they?

2
FireannDireach 2 points ago +2 / -0

They never did, but when you confront them head on, it falls apart fast.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is why they are trying to silence us. Exactly like every tyrant in history has done.

1
lordmastern 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course, but that would mean getting the communist countries to clean up their pollution, and the Commucrats can’t have that.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's part of the plan. Gotta quit letting those hypocrites set policy.