3981
Comments (210)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
27
ravioli_king 27 points ago +34 / -7

Even later than you think, they just finished the 2 forensic audits of the machine and turned up clean. Now a judge approved a forensic audit of the ballots.

34
KitKatCat 34 points ago +35 / -1

That wasn't even the audit the senate wanted. apparently it was a bs audit. Hopefully the senate gets their own team to look at the machines and ballots.

23
dandylionsummer 23 points ago +23 / -0

There will no longer be anything to find....

22
VerGreeneyes 22 points ago +22 / -0

Nothing like a compromised forensic audit for destroying evidence, after all. Perfect excuse to go in there and fix things.

4
MastaJoda 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shit... let’s at least scrutinize tf outta those ballots.

34
deleted 34 points ago +34 / -0
10
FromSethWithLove 10 points ago +10 / -0

*claps hands "ALL CLEAN!"

6
ShyRipley 6 points ago +6 / -0

And now activists in AZ are saying well you know what? Because of who they had do the sham audit on the machines, this is now just like a crime scene and should be handled as such.

I like it.

14
JoeBidensDentures 14 points ago +14 / -0

Of course it did. Got a link?

30
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 30 points ago +30 / -0

The two forensic audits were by that pair of "officially certified" companies that the Left and the RINOs wanted. Not a true 3rd party.

There forensic audit is about as needed as used toilet paper.

12
seektruth2021 12 points ago +13 / -1

Yeah, by what I understand from a Q&A with the county Recorder, he basically admitted that these were the only companies licensed(?) to certify this election equipment. I believe he actually said, "certified." That is NOT the same as a forensic audit, which is the impression the BoS has been trying to give. Well, unless you complain about not allowing observers, and then your lawyers argue that no, in fact, this is definitely not an audit.

That is like passing Obamacare by claiming it is not a tax, and then defending it in the supreme court by saying it IS a tax.

4
cryogen 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Licensed" just means approved by the very bodies under suspicion. It's like the Mafia telling you that Uncle Tony's is definitely the only Accounting firm that can look at the Boss's books. Because he's "licensed"!

1
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. Hence the disdain for it.

8
LibreFloridaMan 8 points ago +8 / -0

No here is what happened. The board said they would comply after inaugaration. Then they went against their word and said they would do a seperate limited scope audit with 2 "ceritified" firms which were basically Dominion shell companies. As you would expect, it was an inch deep investigation. Their machine audit consisted of looking at the serial code of the machine and other bullshit. Borelli, the based AZ senator spearheading the senate audit, literally said on OANN that all they did was check if it works and only looked at a handful of ballots. Didn't even compare to ballot images. There was only one audit done by two "independent" companies (both have ties to Dominion and/or Smartmatic) hired by Maricopa BOS which was pure PR to push the "cleanest election ever" narrative. They tried to use this sham audit to attempt to beg the court to dismiss the subpeonas which failed. This is a seperate audit that is an actual deep investigation with based AZ senators on our side in charge.

4
cryogen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those weren't "forensic audits," they were rubber-stamps provided by complete bullshit firms.